You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the consts translation pass can only handle indexing into a slice if it represents an entire vec, not a sub-vec thereof. Since we don't (presently) have any syntax for making a sub-slice as a const expr, this isn't a big deal. Yet. But it might become one in the future. If so, we need to do a fair bit more work in the const translator, since it appears LLVM doesn't want to feed us back the number-values of consts that depend in any way on the size of a datum. Such as, say, a size bound.