New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue for non-panicking pow #48320

Open
milesand opened this Issue Feb 18, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@milesand
Contributor

milesand commented Feb 18, 2018

Relevant PR: #48321

@pietroalbini pietroalbini added the T-libs label Feb 20, 2018

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2018

Rollup merge of rust-lang#48321 - milesand:no_panic_pow, r=alexcrichton
Add non-panicking variants of pow for integer types

Currently, calling pow may panic in case of overflow, and the function does not have non-panicking counterparts. Thus, it would be beneficial to add those in.

Closes rust-lang#48291.
Relevant tracking issue: rust-lang#48320

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2018

Rollup merge of rust-lang#48321 - milesand:no_panic_pow, r=alexcrichton
Add non-panicking variants of pow for integer types

Currently, calling pow may panic in case of overflow, and the function does not have non-panicking counterparts. Thus, it would be beneficial to add those in.

Closes rust-lang#48291.
Relevant tracking issue: rust-lang#48320
@Restioson

This comment has been minimized.

Restioson commented Aug 7, 2018

Can this be closed?

@milesand

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

milesand commented Sep 16, 2018

I'm sorry, it's been a while.

While this feature hasn't received much feedback by itself, but with already-stable similar functionalities present, I think this feature can be stabilized as-is.

I'm not familiar with the stabilization process though. What should I do here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment