Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NLL impl_trait_in_bindings ICE #57200

DutchGhost opened this issue Dec 29, 2018 · 1 comment

NLL impl_trait_in_bindings ICE #57200

DutchGhost opened this issue Dec 29, 2018 · 1 comment


Copy link

@DutchGhost DutchGhost commented Dec 29, 2018

fn bug<'a, 'b, T>()
    'a: 'b,
    let f: impl Fn(&'a T) -> &'b T = |x| x;

fn main() {}
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'assertion failed: self.universal_regions.is_universal_region(shorter)', src/librustc_mir/borrow_check/nll/type_check/
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
stack backtrace:
   0: std::sys::unix::backtrace::tracing::imp::unwind_backtrace
             at src/libstd/sys/unix/backtrace/tracing/
   1: std::sys_common::backtrace::_print
             at src/libstd/sys_common/
   2: std::panicking::default_hook::{{closure}}
             at src/libstd/sys_common/
             at src/libstd/
   3: std::panicking::default_hook
             at src/libstd/
   4: rustc::util::common::panic_hook
   5: std::panicking::rust_panic_with_hook
             at src/libstd/
   6: std::panicking::begin_panic
   7: <rustc_mir::borrow_check::nll::type_check::free_region_relations::UniversalRegionRelations<'tcx> as rustc::infer::outlives::free_region_map::FreeRegionRelations<'tcx>>::sub_free_regions
   8: rustc::infer::InferCtxt::commit_if_ok
   9: <rustc::traits::query::type_op::custom::CustomTypeOp<F, G> as rustc::traits::query::type_op::TypeOp<'gcx, 'tcx>>::fully_perform
  10: rustc_mir::borrow_check::nll::type_check::TypeChecker::eq_opaque_type_and_type
  11: rustc_mir::borrow_check::nll::type_check::TypeChecker::check_stmt
  12: rustc_mir::borrow_check::nll::type_check::TypeChecker::typeck_mir
  13: rustc_mir::borrow_check::nll::type_check::type_check
  14: rustc_mir::borrow_check::do_mir_borrowck
  15: rustc::ty::context::GlobalCtxt::enter_local
  16: rustc_mir::borrow_check::mir_borrowck
  17: rustc::ty::query::__query_compute::mir_borrowck
  18: rustc::ty::query::<impl rustc::ty::query::config::QueryAccessors<'tcx> for rustc::ty::query::queries::mir_borrowck<'tcx>>::compute
  19: rustc::dep_graph::graph::DepGraph::with_task_impl
  20: <rustc::ty::query::plumbing::JobOwner<'a, 'tcx, Q>>::start
  21: rustc::ty::query::plumbing::<impl rustc::ty::context::TyCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>>::force_query_with_job
  22: rustc::ty::query::plumbing::<impl rustc::ty::context::TyCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>>::try_get_with
  23: rustc::ty::<impl rustc::ty::context::TyCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>>::par_body_owners
  24: rustc::util::common::time
  25: <std::thread::local::LocalKey<T>>::with
  26: rustc::ty::context::TyCtxt::create_and_enter
  27: rustc_driver::driver::compile_input
  28: rustc_driver::run_compiler_with_pool
  29: <scoped_tls::ScopedKey<T>>::set
  30: rustc_driver::run_compiler
  31: <scoped_tls::ScopedKey<T>>::set
query stack during panic:
#0 [mir_borrowck] processing `bug`
end of query stack

error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic

note: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug.

note: we would appreciate a bug report:

note: rustc 1.33.0-nightly (60e825389 2018-12-28) running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

note: compiler flags: -C opt-level=3 -C codegen-units=1 --crate-type bin

note: some of the compiler flags provided by cargo are hidden

error: Could not compile `playground`.

2015's Edition compiles fine (without NLL), 2018 ICE's

Copy link

@Alexendoo Alexendoo commented Feb 16, 2020

Fixed by #67681

Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this issue Mar 9, 2020
Add more regression tests

Closes rust-lang#54239
Closes rust-lang#57200
Closes rust-lang#57201
Closes rust-lang#60473
Closes rust-lang#64620
Closes rust-lang#67166

r? @Centril
@bors bors closed this in 7e903f8 Mar 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

7 participants