Skip to content

Implement await syntax #60016

Description

@nikomatsakis

As of this writing, we have not settled the precise syntax we will use for await. However, we have decided that we want to decide -- so it makes sense to get started on implementation. This issue is focused purely on implementation issues; the question of what syntax to use is covered in #57640.

Activity

  1. added
    T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
    AsyncAwait-PolishAsync-await issues that are part of the "polish" area
    on Apr 16, 2019
  2. cramertj commented on Apr 23, 2019

    @cramertj
    Member

    I've finished this, pending changes to whatever final syntax is chosen.

  3. estebank commented on Apr 25, 2019

    @estebank
    Contributor
  4. cramertj commented on Apr 25, 2019

    @cramertj
    Member

    @estebank Yeah, it fixes #51751 and #51719.

  5. added a commit that references this issue on May 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

A-async-awaitArea: Async & AwaitAsyncAwait-PolishAsync-await issues that are part of the "polish" areaT-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions