Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix doc of log function #101754

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 13, 2022
Merged

Fix doc of log function #101754

merged 1 commit into from Sep 13, 2022

Conversation

NaokiM03
Copy link
Contributor

Hi.

I found a forgotten documentation correction in the following pull request.
#100332

See also:
#70887

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 13, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @scottmcm (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 13, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 13, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 13, 2022

📌 Commit a4f8d3e has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 13, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2022
…an-DPC

Fix doc of log function

Hi.

I found a forgotten documentation correction in the following pull request.
rust-lang#100332

See also:
rust-lang#70887
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#101266 (translations(rustc_session): migrates rustc_session to use SessionDiagnostic - Final)
 - rust-lang#101737 (rustdoc: remove no-op CSS `.search-results .result-name > span`)
 - rust-lang#101752 (Improve Attribute doc methods)
 - rust-lang#101754 (Fix doc of log function)
 - rust-lang#101759 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
 - rust-lang#101765 (Add documentation for TyCtxt::visibility)
 - rust-lang#101770 (Rustdoc-Json: Don't loose subitems of foreign traits.)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e44073b into rust-lang:master Sep 13, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Sep 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants