-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix missing reexports' doc comments #104292
Fix missing reexports' doc comments #104292
Conversation
@bors r+ rollup=never (might have a perf impact) |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (e4d6307): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. |
…-doc-comments, r=notriddle Fix missing reexports' doc comments Fixes rust-lang#81893. The issue was that an import directly "links" to the target without the intermediate imports. Unfortunately, to fix this bug we need to go through them one by one. To do so, I take the import path direct parent (so `b` in `a::b::c`) and then look for `c` into it. r? `@notriddle`
Fixes #81893.
The issue was that an import directly "links" to the target without the intermediate imports. Unfortunately, to fix this bug we need to go through them one by one. To do so, I take the import path direct parent (so
b
ina::b::c
) and then look forc
into it.r? @notriddle