Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add #[inline] to CStr trait implementations #109682

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2023
Merged

Add #[inline] to CStr trait implementations #109682

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2023

Conversation

clubby789
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #109674

I noticed other usages of traits on CStr weren't being inlined, so also added hints to the other implementations

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 27, 2023

r? @thomcc

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 27, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 27, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 28, 2023

📌 Commit 901f108 has been approved by scottmcm

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 28, 2023
@scottmcm scottmcm assigned scottmcm and unassigned thomcc Mar 28, 2023
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2023
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2023
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#109690 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-6p5m0es, r=matth…
f418859 
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#108548 (Clarify the 'use a constant in a pattern' error message)
 - rust-lang#109565 (Improve documentation for E0223)
 - rust-lang#109661 (Fix LVI test post LLVM 16 update)
 - rust-lang#109667 (Always set `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP` with `x doc`)
 - rust-lang#109669 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#109678 (Don't shadow the `dep_node` var in `incremental_verify_ich_failed`)
 - rust-lang#109682 (Add `#[inline]` to CStr trait implementations)
 - rust-lang#109685 (Make doc comment a little bit more accurate)
 - rust-lang#109687 (Document the heuristics IsTerminal uses on Windows)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 90b6c71 into rust-lang:master Mar 28, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Mar 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@scottmcm scottmcm scottmcm left review comments

Assignees

@scottmcm scottmcm

Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.70.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CStr eq acts as an optimization barrier
5 participants
@clubby789 @rustbot @scottmcm @bors @thomcc