Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert #109075 to partially fix #114375 #114988

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

joboet
Copy link
Contributor

@joboet joboet commented Aug 19, 2023

Revert #109075 so that using Backtrace does not cause the ICE described in #114375. Once TAIT is in a better state, I'll reapply the PR.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 19, 2023

r? @thomcc

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 19, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Do you have any objections to adding a test like #114375 (comment) with -Zvalidate-mir, or is this too specific?

@joboet
Copy link
Contributor Author

joboet commented Aug 19, 2023

Do you have any objections to adding a test like #114375 (comment) with -Zvalidate-mir, or is this too specific?

I think that's too specific, the old version does not use any special features like TAIT, so there should be no reason for the compiler to generate broken MIR.

@joboet
Copy link
Contributor Author

joboet commented Aug 19, 2023

Closing in favour of #115005.

@joboet joboet closed this Aug 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants