Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve PadAdapter::write_char #115782

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 17, 2023
Merged

Conversation

a1phyr
Copy link
Contributor

@a1phyr a1phyr commented Sep 12, 2023

Split from #108043

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 12, 2023

r? @joshtriplett

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 12, 2023
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Sep 16, 2023

Per #108043 (comment):
@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 16, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 16, 2023

⌛ Trying commit 814f4f6 with merge 1efdb58...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2023
@dtolnay dtolnay assigned dtolnay and unassigned joshtriplett Sep 16, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 16, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 1efdb58 (1efdb58c9f001ce64a4416bba0852254af220412)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (1efdb58): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.2% [2.1%, 2.3%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 632.183s -> 634.704s (0.40%)
Artifact size: 318.14 MiB -> 318.19 MiB (0.01%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 16, 2023
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Sep 16, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 16, 2023

📌 Commit 814f4f6 has been approved by dtolnay

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 16, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 16, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 814f4f6 with merge 3ae41aa...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job aarch64-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
   Compiling addr2line v0.21.0
[RUSTC-TIMING] addr2line test:false 0.546
[RUSTC-TIMING] gimli test:false 4.861
[RUSTC-TIMING] object test:false 5.632
##[error]The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.
##[group]Clock drift check
  local time: Sun Sep 17 00:01:51 UTC 2023
  network time: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 00:01:51 GMT
##[endgroup]
##[endgroup]
Session terminated, killing shell... ...killed.
##[error]The operation was canceled.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 17, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 17, 2023
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Sep 17, 2023

Can't tell what failed.
@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 17, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 17, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 814f4f6 with merge a09c1f8...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 17, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: dtolnay
Pushing a09c1f8 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 17, 2023
@bors bors merged commit a09c1f8 into rust-lang:master Sep 17, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 17, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a09c1f8): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.7% [-3.1%, -2.3%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.6% [-3.6%, -0.8%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.7% [-3.1%, -2.3%] 2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 635.152s -> 635.86s (0.11%)
Artifact size: 318.44 MiB -> 318.46 MiB (0.00%)

@a1phyr a1phyr deleted the improve_pad_adapter branch September 17, 2023 21:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants