Rollup of 9 pull requests #120412
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #120412
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The feature does not seem to be required by this doctest.
I did some benchmark digging into the `intersperse` and `intersperse_with` code as part of the https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/add-iterate-with-separators-iterator-function/18781/13 discussion, and as a result I optimized them a bit, without relying on the peekable iterator.
Co-authored-by: Josh Stone <cuviper@gmail.com>
last usages removed by rust-lang#116170
When encountering an attribute in a body, we try to recover from an attribute on an expression (as opposed to a statement). We need to properly clean up when the attribute is at the end of the body where a tail expression would be. Fix rust-lang#118164.
Do not attempt to provide an accurate suggestion for `impl Trait` in bare trait types when linting. Instead, only do the object safety check when an E0782 is already going to be emitted in the 2021 edition. Fix rust-lang#120241.
…iper Boost iterator intersperse(_with) performance I did some benchmark digging into the `intersperse` and `intersperse_with` code as part of [this discussion](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/add-iterate-with-separators-iterator-function/18781/13), and as a result I optimized them a bit, without relying on the peekable iterator. See also [full benchmark repo](https://github.com/nyurik/intersperse_perf) Benchmarks show near 2x performance improvements with the simple `sum` [benchmarks](https://gist.github.com/nyurik/68b6c9b3d90f0d14746d4186bf8fa1e2): 
Properly recover from trailing attr in body When encountering an attribute in a body, we try to recover from an attribute on an expression (as opposed to a statement). We need to properly clean up when the attribute is at the end of the body where a tail expression would be. Fix rust-lang#118164, fix rust-lang#118575.
…sDenton Remove feature not required by `Ipv6Addr::to_cononical` doctest The feature does not seem to be required by this doctest.
fix: correct suggestion arg for impl trait follow up rust-lang#118502, close rust-lang#119775
Avoid ICE in trait without `dyn` lint Do not attempt to provide an accurate suggestion for `impl Trait` in bare trait types when linting. Instead, only do the object safety check when an E0782 is already going to be emitted in the 2021 edition. Fix rust-lang#120241.
Update codegen test for LLVM 18 r? ```@cuviper```
…ler-errors ScopeTree: remove destruction_scopes as unused last usages removed by rust-lang#116170 Unused, but still presented in memory at `t-gmax` (in DHAT termonology)
…piler-errors Improve handling of numbers in `IntoDiagnosticArg` While working on rust-lang#120393, I realize that my fluent selectors were not working. So here is an improvement (not a fix unfortunately).
…rieb Remove myself from review rotation Still willing to do reviews (and make it through my backlog), but I don't have the bandwidth to be on the rotation right now.
rustbot
added
A-meta
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2024
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#111379 (Boost iterator intersperse(_with) performance) - rust-lang#118182 (Properly recover from trailing attr in body) - rust-lang#119641 (Remove feature not required by `Ipv6Addr::to_cononical` doctest) - rust-lang#119957 (fix: correct suggestion arg for impl trait) - rust-lang#120275 (Avoid ICE in trait without `dyn` lint) - rust-lang#120376 (Update codegen test for LLVM 18) - rust-lang#120386 (ScopeTree: remove destruction_scopes as unused) - rust-lang#120398 (Improve handling of numbers in `IntoDiagnosticArg`) - rust-lang#120399 (Remove myself from review rotation) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Ipv6Addr::to_cononicaldoctest #119641 (Remove feature not required byIpv6Addr::to_cononicaldoctest)dynlint #120275 (Avoid ICE in trait withoutdynlint)IntoDiagnosticArg#120398 (Improve handling of numbers inIntoDiagnosticArg)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup