Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Ord from ClosureKind #122237

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2024
Merged

Remove Ord from ClosureKind #122237

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2024

Conversation

fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

Using Ord to accomplish a meaning of subset relationship can be hard to read. The existing uses for that are easily replaced with a match, and in my opinion, more readable without needing to resorting to comments to explain the intention.

cc @compiler-errors

Using `Ord` to accomplish a meaning of subset relationship
can be hard to read. The existing uses for that are easily
replaced with a `match`, and in my opinion, more readable
without needing to resorting to comments to explain the
intention.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 9, 2024

r? @michaelwoerister

rustbot has assigned @michaelwoerister.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 9, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2024

📌 Commit 7e1969a has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 9, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#121358 (Reduce alignment of TypeId to u64 alignment)
 - rust-lang#121813 (Misc improvements to non local defs lint implementation)
 - rust-lang#122160 (Eagerly translate `HelpUseLatestEdition` in parser diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#122178 (ci: add a runner for vanilla LLVM 18)
 - rust-lang#122187 (Move metadata header and version checks together)
 - rust-lang#122209 (fix incorrect path resolution in tidy)
 - rust-lang#122215 (Some tweaks to the parallel query cycle handler)
 - rust-lang#122223 (Fix typo in `VisitorResult`)
 - rust-lang#122224 (Add missing regression tests)
 - rust-lang#122232 (library/core: fix a comment, and a cfg(miri) warning)
 - rust-lang#122233 (miri: do not apply aliasing restrictions to Box with custom allocator)
 - rust-lang#122237 (Remove `Ord` from `ClosureKind`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7193ce0 into rust-lang:master Mar 9, 2024
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122237 - fee1-dead-contrib:rmord, r=compiler-errors

Remove `Ord` from `ClosureKind`

Using `Ord` to accomplish a meaning of subset relationship can be hard to read. The existing uses for that are easily replaced with a `match`, and in my opinion, more readable without needing to resorting to comments to explain the intention.

cc `@compiler-errors`
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Mar 9, 2024
@fee1-dead fee1-dead deleted the rmord branch March 11, 2024 09:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants