Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

f16::is_sign_{positive,negative} were feature-gated on f128 #124828

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2024

Conversation

tspiteri
Copy link
Contributor

@tspiteri tspiteri commented May 6, 2024

f16::is_sign_positive and f16::is_sign_negative were feature-gated on "f128" instead of "f16".

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 6, 2024

r? @Nilstrieb

rustbot has assigned @Nilstrieb.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 6, 2024
@Nilstrieb
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 7, 2024

📌 Commit fac0a74 has been approved by Nilstrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 7, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 7, 2024

⌛ Testing commit fac0a74 with merge 14081a2...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 7, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Nilstrieb
Pushing 14081a2 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 7, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 14081a2 into rust-lang:master May 7, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 7, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (14081a2): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.8% [1.4%, 2.3%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.0% [2.0%, 2.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.8% [1.4%, 2.3%] 2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
5.3% [5.3%, 5.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 676.069s -> 675.464s (-0.09%)
Artifact size: 315.95 MiB -> 315.71 MiB (-0.07%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants