Collapse Analysis|Borrowck|PostBorrowckAnalysis when there are no opaques

[compiler-errors]

r? lcnr

[compiler-errors]

@bors2 try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

⌛ Trying commit 582c2df with merge 39fdb4c…

To cancel the try build, run the command @bors2 try cancel.

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 39fdb4c (39fdb4c569c50e081bd1bc150f9fb2eb6b4326de, parent: 9c4ff566babe632af5e30281a822d1ae9972873b)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (39fdb4c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.1%	[-7.6%, -0.2%]	16
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -6.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-6.1%	[-13.1%, -1.9%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (primary 2.4%, secondary -3.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.4%	[-7.6%, -1.3%]	10
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 692.606s -> 694.227s (0.23%)
Artifact size: 372.01 MiB -> 371.94 MiB (-0.02%)

[lcnr]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 582c2df has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 582c2df with merge 35f6036...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lcnr
Pushing 35f6036 to master...

[github-actions]

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing ed2d759 (parent) -> 35f6036 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 35f6036521777bdc0dcea1f980be4c192962a168 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

1. dist-aarch64-linux: 5673.5s -> 7897.9s (39.2%)
2. dist-x86_64-apple: 9853.2s -> 7744.9s (-21.4%)
3. x86_64-apple-1: 6121.6s -> 7425.1s (21.3%)
4. aarch64-apple: 4178.0s -> 5031.9s (20.4%)
5. i686-gnu-2: 5448.9s -> 6210.2s (14.0%)
6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-1: 3277.7s -> 3722.1s (13.6%)
7. i686-gnu-nopt-1: 7188.1s -> 7973.8s (10.9%)
8. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2640.3s -> 2917.2s (10.5%)
9. x86_64-gnu-debug: 5375.2s -> 5938.4s (10.5%)
10. dist-ohos-aarch64: 4594.3s -> 4132.1s (-10.1%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (35f6036): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.2%	[0.1%, 0.2%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.4%	[-7.5%, -0.5%]	14
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -6.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-6.0%	[-10.2%, -2.0%]	9
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (primary 0.4%, secondary -3.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.8%	[1.8%, 1.8%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.1%	[-1.1%, -1.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.5%	[-7.4%, -1.3%]	10
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.4%	[-1.1%, 1.8%]	2

Binary size

Results (secondary 0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Bootstrap: 694.715s -> 695.714s (0.14%)
Artifact size: 371.77 MiB -> 371.68 MiB (-0.02%)