Skip to content

Conversation

yotamofek
Copy link
Contributor

This PR mostly removes a bunch of crate-level attributes that were added at some point, but then later on became unnecessary:

  • some #[feature] gates
  • some #[allow]s
  • a #[recursion_limit]

Then I went ahead and sprinkled some tidy sorting on the remaining attrs, and Cargo.toml.

Trying to give my anal retentiveness some peace of mind 😅

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 28, 2025

r? @GuillaumeGomez

rustbot has assigned @GuillaumeGomez.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 28, 2025
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks! 🤣

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 28, 2025

📌 Commit 581cb11 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 28, 2025
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2025
…compiler-errors

Remove unused feature gates

After finding some unused feature gates in rust-lang#143155 , I wrote a small script to see if I can find any others.
And I did. Not a lot, but still a small win 😁
Contains a few instances of `iter_from_coroutine` that can be removed due to rust-lang#142801 (I guess).
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #142021 (Doc: clarify priority of lint level sources)
 - #142367 (Add regression test for #137857 to ensure that we generate intra doc links for extern crate items.)
 - #142641 (Generate symbols.o for proc-macros too)
 - #142889 (Clarify doc comment on unix OpenOptions)
 - #143063 (explain `ImportData::imported_module`)
 - #143088 (Improve documentation of `TagEncoding`)
 - #143135 (fix typos on some doc comments)
 - #143138 (Port `#[link_name]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure)
 - #143155 (`librustdoc` house-keeping 🧹)
 - #143169 (Remove unused feature gates)
 - #143171 (Fix the span of trait bound modifier `[const]`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 8dbc25c into rust-lang:master Jun 29, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.90.0 milestone Jun 29, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2025
Rollup merge of #143169 - yotamofek:pr/unneeded-features, r=compiler-errors

Remove unused feature gates

After finding some unused feature gates in #143155 , I wrote a small script to see if I can find any others.
And I did. Not a lot, but still a small win 😁
Contains a few instances of `iter_from_coroutine` that can be removed due to #142801 (I guess).
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2025
Rollup merge of #143155 - yotamofek:pr/rustdoc/housekeeping, r=GuillaumeGomez

`librustdoc` house-keeping 🧹

This PR mostly removes a bunch of crate-level attributes that were added at some point, but then later on became unnecessary:
- some `#[feature]` gates
- some `#[allow]`s
- a `#[recursion_limit]`

Then I went ahead and sprinkled some tidy sorting on the remaining attrs, and `Cargo.toml`.

Trying to give my anal retentiveness some peace of mind 😅
@yotamofek yotamofek deleted the pr/rustdoc/housekeeping branch June 29, 2025 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants