Skip to content

Conversation

Kivooeo
Copy link
Member

@Kivooeo Kivooeo commented Jul 19, 2025

r? @jieyouxu

As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.

This change was discussed here #t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 19, 2025

jieyouxu is not on the review rotation at the moment.
They may take a while to respond.

@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself A-tidy Area: The tidy tool S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Jul 19, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 19, 2025

There are changes to the tidy tool.

cc @jieyouxu

triagebot.toml has been modified, there may have been changes to the review queue.

cc @davidtwco, @wesleywiser

@Kivooeo Kivooeo changed the title removed tidy check on issues files Removed tidy checks on issues.txt Jul 19, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't leave commented out code, just delete it.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Jul 19, 2025

Once work on tests/ui/issues/ is complete, this change will be reverted accordingly.

Once that work is complete, we won't need this check (there were way too many tests under tests/ui/issues/, which is why this check exists in the first place).

@Kivooeo Kivooeo force-pushed the tidy_checks branch 2 times, most recently from da05401 to 3720916 Compare July 19, 2025 10:56
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

spellcheck is broken for other reasons, u can ignore.

@Kivooeo
Copy link
Member Author

Kivooeo commented Jul 19, 2025

Should be fine now, only reason I need tidy to ignore deleted issue-*.rs files from issues/ is to completely remove any interactions with issues.txt file while working on tests

I will remove all moved tests from issues.txt in separate PR after issues/ is clean

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 20, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #144181) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

Should be fine now, only reason I need tidy to ignore deleted issue-*.rs files from issues/ is to completely remove any interactions with issues.txt file while working on tests

I will remove all moved tests from issues.txt in separate PR after issues/ is clean

Can you rebless issues.txt (perhaps manually) to remove all ui/issues/** entries? I feel like leaving that in is quite surprising (especially given that said tests might not even exist after getting moved).

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 21, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 21, 2025

Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use @rustbot ready.

@Kivooeo
Copy link
Member Author

Kivooeo commented Jul 21, 2025

Can you rebless issues.txt (perhaps manually) to remove all ui/issues/** entries

With keeping removing this checks?

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

My understanding of the intention is that:

  • We want to skip the issues-* check for tests/ui/issues/, because there are now actually contributors (like you) trying to clean it up, so that gets in the way as issue-* tests get removed from tests/ui/issues/. The issues.txt is a listing of all issues-* tests. We should update this listing to remove ui/issues/ ones, as we are no longer tracking issue-* tests under tests/ui/issues/.

@Kivooeo
Copy link
Member Author

Kivooeo commented Jul 21, 2025

@rustbot ready

deleted all lines that starts with ui/issues/

reverted this filter on issues/ tests from here

let mut remaining_issue_names: BTreeSet<&str> = allowed_issue_names.clone();

but kept this, because otherwise it's threw errors about existed tests

if !remaining_issue_names.remove(stripped_path.as_str())
&& !stripped_path.starts_with("ui/issues/")

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Jul 21, 2025
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jul 22, 2025
@jieyouxu jieyouxu changed the title Removed tidy checks on issues.txt Removed tidy checks for tests/ui/issues/ Jul 22, 2025
@Kivooeo Kivooeo changed the title Removed tidy checks for tests/ui/issues/ Remove tidy checks for tests/ui/issues/ Jul 22, 2025
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2025
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`

r? `@jieyouxu`

As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.

This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2025
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`

r? ``@jieyouxu``

As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.

This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2025
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`

r? ```@jieyouxu```

As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.

This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn)
 - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`)
 - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize)
 - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib)
 - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7)
 - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId)
 - #144272 (resolve: Make disambiguators for underscore bindings module-local (take 2))
 - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`

r? ````@jieyouxu````

As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.

This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`

r? `````@jieyouxu`````

As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.

This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`

r? ``````@jieyouxu``````

As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.

This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`

r? ```````@jieyouxu```````

As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.

This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`

r? ````````@jieyouxu````````

As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.

This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`)
 - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7)
 - #144239 (Clean `rustc/parse/src/lexer` to improve maintainability)
 - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2)
 - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId)
 - #144290 (update tests/ui/SUMMARY.md)
 - #144292 (mbe: Use concrete type for `get_unused_rule`)
 - #144298 (coverage: Enlarge empty spans during MIR instrumentation, not codegen)
 - #144311 (Add powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl to CI rustc targets)
 - #144315 (bootstrap: add package.json and package-lock.json to dist tarball)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`

r? `````````@jieyouxu`````````

As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.

This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`)
 - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7)
 - #144239 (Clean `rustc/parse/src/lexer` to improve maintainability)
 - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2)
 - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId)
 - #144290 (update tests/ui/SUMMARY.md)
 - #144292 (mbe: Use concrete type for `get_unused_rule`)
 - #144298 (coverage: Enlarge empty spans during MIR instrumentation, not codegen)
 - #144311 (Add powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl to CI rustc targets)
 - #144315 (bootstrap: add package.json and package-lock.json to dist tarball)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`)
 - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7)
 - #144239 (Clean `rustc/parse/src/lexer` to improve maintainability)
 - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId)
 - #144290 (update tests/ui/SUMMARY.md)
 - #144292 (mbe: Use concrete type for `get_unused_rule`)
 - #144298 (coverage: Enlarge empty spans during MIR instrumentation, not codegen)
 - #144311 (Add powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl to CI rustc targets)
 - #144315 (bootstrap: add package.json and package-lock.json to dist tarball)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4177f19 into rust-lang:master Jul 23, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.90.0 milestone Jul 23, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Rollup merge of #144173 - Kivooeo:tidy_checks, r=jieyouxu

Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`

r? ``````````@jieyouxu``````````

As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.

This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself A-tidy Area: The tidy tool S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants