-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.8k
Change int-to-ptr transmute lowering back to inttoptr #147541
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
saethlin
wants to merge
1
commit into
rust-lang:master
Choose a base branch
from
saethlin:transmute-carefully
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+28
−8
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | ||||||||||
// This is a regression test for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147265. | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
//@ compile-flags: -Copt-level=3 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
#![crate_type = "lib"] | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
#[no_mangle] | ||||||||||
pub fn mk_result(a: usize) -> Result<u8, *const u8> { | ||||||||||
// CHECK-LABEL: @mk_result | ||||||||||
// CHECK-NOT: unreachable | ||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. suggestion: it's always good to have positive checks too, just in case the negative thing changes, so maybe
Suggested change
|
||||||||||
match g(a) { | ||||||||||
Ok(b) => Ok(unsafe { *(b as *const u8) }), | ||||||||||
Err(c) => Err(c), | ||||||||||
} | ||||||||||
} | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
#[cold] | ||||||||||
fn g(a: usize) -> Result<usize, *const u8> { | ||||||||||
Ok(a) | ||||||||||
} |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, maybe we could add a
BuilderMethods::inttoptr_noprovenance
for this, as that would give us a place to have a-Z
flag that affects what it does so we could put it back to the better version more easily later?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Maybe skip the -Z flag in this PR, if we want something that could go to beta, but if it existed we could test both ways in the codegen test.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Writing the actual implementation here took me about a minute, and I expect it will be similarly near-zero effort to swap it back again. Adding a helper would be more effort.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It just feels like a
-Z mutable-noalias
situation, where being able to test whether something is still broken without a new build is the reason to do it, not because the actual code change is hard.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A dedicated method would also allow backends which don't miscompile it to keep avoiding the provenance.