Skip to content

Remove references to ~[] in core::kinds::marker docs. #16276

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2014
Merged

Remove references to ~[] in core::kinds::marker docs. #16276

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/libcore/kinds.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ pub mod marker {
///
/// The type system would currently infer that the value of
/// the type parameter `T` is irrelevant, and hence a `S<int>` is
/// a subtype of `S<~[int]>` (or, for that matter, `S<U>` for
/// a subtype of `S<Box<int>>` (or, for that matter, `S<U>` for
/// any `U`). But this is incorrect because `get()` converts the
/// `*()` into a `*T` and reads from it. Therefore, we should include the
/// a marker field `CovariantType<T>` to inform the type checker that
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ pub mod marker {
///
/// The type system would currently infer that the value of
/// the type parameter `T` is irrelevant, and hence a `S<int>` is
/// a subtype of `S<~[int]>` (or, for that matter, `S<U>` for
/// a subtype of `S<Box<int>>` (or, for that matter, `S<U>` for
/// any `U`). But this is incorrect because `get()` converts the
/// `*()` into a `fn(T)` and then passes a value of type `T` to it.
///
Expand Down