Feature gate calls to const fns #25880
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this may be a stray ERROR annotation (I also think the explicit crate_type isn't necessary)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, it is. I like having the crate_type there though because it makes it easier to run the tests by hand (I don't have to remember to pass --crate-type)
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2015
…excrichton The previous feature gate assumed we would not define any (stable) const fns. But then @eddyb went and cleaned up the code. So this now extends the feature-gate to prohibit calls; but calls inside of macros are considered ok. r? @alexcrichton
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The previous feature gate assumed we would not define any (stable) const fns. But then @eddyb went and cleaned up the code. So this now extends the feature-gate to prohibit calls; but calls inside of macros are considered ok.
r? @alexcrichton