Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

debuginfo: Create common debugger pretty printer module. #25905

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 2, 2015

Conversation

michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

GDB and LLDB pretty printers have some common functionality and also access some common information, such as the layout of standard library types. So far, this information has been duplicated in the two pretty printing python modules. This PR introduces a common module used by both debuggers.

This PR also implements proper rendering of String and &str values in LLDB.

GDB and LLDB pretty printers have some common functionality
and also access some common information, such as the layout of
standard library types. So far, this information has been
duplicated in the two pretty printing python modules. This
commit introduces a common module used by both debuggers.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Jun 1, 2015

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 1, 2015

📌 Commit d136714 has been approved by brson

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2015
GDB and LLDB pretty printers have some common functionality and also access some common information, such as the layout of standard library types. So far, this information has been duplicated in the two pretty printing python modules. This PR introduces a common module used by both debuggers.

This PR also implements proper rendering of `String` and `&str` values in LLDB.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 2, 2015

⌛ Testing commit d136714 with merge c800b22...

@bors bors merged commit d136714 into rust-lang:master Jun 2, 2015
@retep998
Copy link
Member

retep998 commented Jun 7, 2015

This PR may have caused the issue described in #26070

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants