Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 10 pull requests #28897

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Oct 8, 2015
Merged

Rollup of 10 pull requests #28897

merged 23 commits into from
Oct 8, 2015

Conversation

chills42 and others added 23 commits October 5, 2015 22:25
In rust-lang#28864, @Aarzee submitted some whitespace fixes. I r+'d it. But
@retp998 noticed[1] that this file is explicitly a test of this kind of
whitespace, and so I shouldn't have changed it. This restores the old
line endings.

1: rust-lang#28864 (comment)
Add musl link
Later in text we mention 'step four' and 'step three'. This fix releases user
from counting.
This is to address issue rust-lang#28803 by improving some of the references to closures, to explain what they are more clearly, while hopefully still being concise.

r? @steveklabnik
In rust-lang#28864, @Aarzee submitted some whitespace fixes. I r+'d it. But
@retp998 noticed[1] that this file is explicitly a test of this kind of
whitespace, and so I shouldn't have changed it. This restores the old
line endings.

1: rust-lang#28864 (comment)
…ichton

The diff can hopefully speak for itself. Regardless: this chapter of the book contained a sentence where "the" was mistakenly repeated twice. In this same section, there was a comma separating two sentences where a period should have been. This PR fixes both issues.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/rust-lang/rust/28896)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @pcwalton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+ p=10000000

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2015

📌 Commit 0fbf7ea has been approved by steveklabnik

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 0fbf7ea with merge 1949941...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 8, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-linux-32-nopt-t

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: retry

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: force

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 8, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 0fbf7ea with merge b75fe81...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2015
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

I am pretty sure this is a supurious failure, but not 100% sure, running a PR locally while I tell bors to retry. The rollup queue is getting too big.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

said local test seemed to have worked, but running the full suite now

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

full suite passed for the PR i'm concerned about, running my own full make check-stage2 on the rollup

@bors bors merged commit 0fbf7ea into rust-lang:master Oct 8, 2015
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

🎊

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.