Skip to content

Conversation

jocki84 and others added 17 commits January 30, 2016 17:43
Do not reference machine 'pointers' in explanation of 'size' types.
Simplify explanation and rephrase as per @GuillaumeGomez's suggestion.
Replace "make for" by the slightly more accurate "account for".
Reading this, one item stood out a bit. Small improvements here.

. ‘Compile-time’ is not a noun, ‘compilation time’ was meant;
. Mathematical formulas are best not rendered as code;
. Use the same tense as in other items.
Clarification by more precise specification.
The code examples and previous paragraphs all use `v` and `v2`
…labnik

Avoid linking to itself in implementors section of trait page

Fix rust-lang#32474.
…labnik

Reword explanation of 'size' types.

Do not reference machine 'pointers' in explanation of 'size' types.

I think the number of elements that can be directly addressed is a fundamental feature of a machine architecture in its own right. The fact that it coincides with the ‘size’ of a pointer should be viewed as an ‘implementation detail’ ;)
grammar: fix

Reading this, one item stood out a bit. Small improvements here.

1. ‘Compile-time’ is not a noun, ‘compilation time’ was meant;
1. Mathematical formulas are best not rendered as code;
1. Use the same tense as in other items.
…names-in-ownership, r=GuillaumeGomez

Use `v` instead of `v1` for consistency

The code examples and previous paragraphs all use `v` and `v2`
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @cmr

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors: r+ p=1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 18, 2016

📌 Commit ec44ddc has been approved by steveklabnik

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 18, 2016

⌛ Testing commit ec44ddc with merge b324fa7...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2016
Rollup of 6 pull requests

- Successful merges: #32558, #32906, #33007, #33008, #33035, #33058
- Failed merges: #32912
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 18, 2016

💔 Test failed - auto-win-msvc-32-opt

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: retry

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:44 PM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - auto-win-msvc-32-opt
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-win-msvc-32-opt/builds/3053


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#33081 (comment)

@bors bors merged commit ec44ddc into rust-lang:master Apr 19, 2016
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.