Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redox: Use O_NOFOLLOW for lstat() #43056

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 12, 2017
Merged

Redox: Use O_NOFOLLOW for lstat() #43056

merged 1 commit into from Jul 12, 2017

Conversation

ids1024
Copy link
Contributor

@ids1024 ids1024 commented Jul 4, 2017

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @BurntSushi

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@aidanhs
Copy link
Member

aidanhs commented Jul 5, 2017

Thanks for the PR @ids1024, we'll make sure @BurntSushi or another reviewer gets to this soon!

@aidanhs aidanhs added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 5, 2017
@@ -447,7 +447,10 @@ pub fn stat(p: &Path) -> io::Result<FileAttr> {
}

pub fn lstat(p: &Path) -> io::Result<FileAttr> {
stat(p)
let fd = cvt(syscall::open(p.to_str().unwrap(),
syscall::O_CLOEXEC | syscall::O_STAT | syscall::O_NOFOLLOW))?;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW this should probably also specify O_RDONLY to obey posix (since redox seems to be posixish).

(it's an interesting dilemma whether redox should reject that syscall as-is - it's technically invalid, but linux would accept it because O_RDONLY is defined as 0, so is always implicit. In redox it's defined as 1, so there's a choice between correctness and Linux program compatibility)

Copy link
Contributor

@jackpot51 jackpot51 Jul 8, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

False. O_STAT in Redox allows a file handle to be opened on a file without read permission, if the user has the ability to read the directory. This file handle can only be used for things like fstat.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah I see O_STAT is not posix, I guess that justifies my 'ish' in 'posixish'. Thanks for the clarification.

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Jul 11, 2017

Hi @BurntSushi - are you going to be reviewing this? Should someone else be reviewing it? Just trying to keep it going.

@BurntSushi
Copy link
Member

@arielb1 Ah thanks, I missed this.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2017

📌 Commit 4e26908 has been approved by BurntSushi

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2017

🔒 Merge conflict

@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Jul 11, 2017

@bors: r=burntsushi

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2017

📌 Commit 51260f4 has been approved by burntsushi

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 12, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 51260f4 with merge cd71ea7...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2017
Redox: Use O_NOFOLLOW for lstat()
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 12, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: burntsushi
Pushing cd71ea7 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 51260f4 into rust-lang:master Jul 12, 2017
@ids1024 ids1024 deleted the nofollow2 branch July 12, 2017 04:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants