Skip to content

Conversation

zackmdavis
Copy link
Contributor

This multiline string literal was missing a backslash, leaving an awkward
newline and 35 spaces in the middle of the message.

But while we're here, the existing message seems kind of long in comparison to
similar notes: to cut it down, we excise the mentions of doc comments, which
seems sensible because we know that this erroneous attribute is not a doc
comment (notice the is_sugared_doc: false at the end of the function; if it
had been a doc comment, that error would get set in the token::DocComment
match branch of parse_outer_attributes).

This multiline string literal was missing a backslash, leaving an awkward
newline and 35 spaces in the middle of the message.

But while we're here, the existing message seems kind of long in comparison to
similar notes: to cut it down, we excise the mentions of doc comments, which
seems sensible because we know that this erroneous attribute is not a doc
comment (notice the `is_sugared_doc: false` at the end of the function; if it
had been a doc comment, that error would get set in the `token::DocComment`
match branch of `parse_outer_attributes`).
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @pnkfelix

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@zackmdavis
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @estebank

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned estebank and unassigned pnkfelix Oct 31, 2017
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 31, 2017

📌 Commit 42ef3f1 has been approved by estebank

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 31, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 42ef3f1 with merge b8f5160...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2017
…estebank

edit and fix bad spacing of inner-attribute-not-allowed note

This multiline string literal was missing a backslash, leaving an awkward
newline and 35 spaces in the middle of the message.

But while we're here, the existing message seems kind of long in comparison to
similar notes: to cut it down, we excise the mentions of doc comments, which
seems sensible because we know that this erroneous attribute is not a doc
comment (notice the `is_sugared_doc: false` at the end of the function; if it
had been a doc comment, that error would get set in the `token::DocComment`
match branch of `parse_outer_attributes`).
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 31, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Oct 31, 2017

@bors retry

Travis incident, no jobs starting. https://www.traviscistatus.com/incidents/xgpn2tq6mx7k

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 31, 2017
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2017
…tr_note, r=estebank

edit and fix bad spacing of inner-attribute-not-allowed note

This multiline string literal was missing a backslash, leaving an awkward
newline and 35 spaces in the middle of the message.

But while we're here, the existing message seems kind of long in comparison to
similar notes: to cut it down, we excise the mentions of doc comments, which
seems sensible because we know that this erroneous attribute is not a doc
comment (notice the `is_sugared_doc: false` at the end of the function; if it
had been a doc comment, that error would get set in the `token::DocComment`
match branch of `parse_outer_attributes`).
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2017
Rollup of 14 pull requests

- Successful merges: #45450, #45579, #45602, #45619, #45624, #45644, #45646, #45648, #45649, #45650, #45652, #45660, #45664, #45671
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 42ef3f1 into rust-lang:master Nov 1, 2017
@zackmdavis zackmdavis deleted the edit_disallowed_inner_attr_note branch January 13, 2018 07:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants