Add Timespec comment and assert about negative nsec #4575
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
catamorphism
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2013
Add Timespec comment and assert about negative nsec
|
Thanks! |
RalfJung
added a commit
to RalfJung/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2025
weak memory tests: add more info on where they come from, and test list of behaviors more thoroughly
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added the comment about negative
nsecthat @catamorphism asked for in pull request #4519.I also added an
nsecrange assert toTimespec::new(). If a user really wants aTimespecwith an out-of-rangensec, they can allocate theTimespecdirectly without callingnew().