Skip to content

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Fixes #46595.

r? @QuietMisdreavus

If possible, I'd appreciate a strong check on this PR. :3

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 13, 2017
@QuietMisdreavus
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure this is a total fix. For example, the "String::from_u" search from the issue is still missing String::from_utf(8|16)_lossy and from_utf8_unchecked:

image

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez force-pushed the more-relevant-doc-search branch from 3a4a818 to 97c18f4 Compare December 15, 2017 14:45
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@QuietMisdreavus: And with the last change? Does it match better?

@QuietMisdreavus
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, the last change fixes the specific queries in the linked issue. Some other lev-based queries that i tried (as a control based on previous search PRs) still worked out, so i'll call this good.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 18, 2017

📌 Commit 97c18f4 has been approved by QuietMisdreavus

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2017
…arch, r=QuietMisdreavus

make doc search more relevant

Fixes rust-lang#46595.

r? @QuietMisdreavus

If possible, I'd appreciate a strong check on this PR. :3
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2017
Rollup of 11 pull requests

- Successful merges: #46700, #46786, #46790, #46800, #46801, #46802, #46804, #46805, #46812, #46824, #46825
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 97c18f4 into rust-lang:master Dec 19, 2017
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the more-relevant-doc-search branch December 19, 2017 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants