Skip to content

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

This little piece of infra is obsolete (ha-ha) and is unlikely to be used in the future, even if new obsolete syntax appears.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 26, 2018
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors rollup

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 27, 2018

📌 Commit 604bbee has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 27, 2018
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2018
libsyntax: Remove obsolete.rs

This little piece of infra is obsolete (ha-ha) and is unlikely to be used in the future, even if new obsolete syntax appears.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2018
Rollup of 11 pull requests

- Successful merges: #48639, #49223, #49333, #49369, #49381, #49395, #49399, #49401, #49417, #49202, #49426
- Failed merges:
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2018
Rollup of 11 pull requests

- Successful merges: #48639, #49223, #49333, #49369, #49381, #49395, #49399, #49401, #49417, #49202, #49426
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 604bbee into rust-lang:master Mar 28, 2018
@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the obsolete branch June 5, 2019 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants