Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upAllow to dispatch fn traits depending on number of parameters #55986
Conversation
rust-highfive
assigned
cramertj
Nov 15, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @cramertj (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
label
Nov 15, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-highfive
assigned
nikomatsakis
and unassigned
cramertj
Nov 15, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
nikomatsakis
requested changes
Nov 20, 2018
|
Looks good! Can you add the comment and explain that one case? |
cjgillot
force-pushed the
cjgillot:issue-45510
branch
from
ab168ba
to
2ab7a74
Nov 21, 2018
cjgillot
changed the title
WIP: Allow to dispatch fn traits depending on number of parameters
Allow to dispatch fn traits depending on number of parameters
Nov 25, 2018
nikomatsakis
requested changes
Nov 26, 2018
|
can we tweak the tests a bit to show that we are actually calling the fn as expected etc? |
src/test/ui/issue-18952.rs Outdated
src/test/ui/issue-45510.rs Outdated
nikomatsakis
added
S-waiting-on-author
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
labels
Nov 26, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
cjgillot
force-pushed the
cjgillot:issue-45510
branch
from
49ed503
to
bea0ae6
Dec 1, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
cjgillot
force-pushed the
cjgillot:issue-45510
branch
from
bea0ae6
to
ee1c962
Dec 8, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
cjgillot
force-pushed the
cjgillot:issue-45510
branch
from
ee1c962
to
4522900
Dec 18, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
cjgillot
added some commits
Nov 4, 2018
cjgillot
force-pushed the
cjgillot:issue-45510
branch
from
4522900
to
91c155b
Dec 30, 2018
nikomatsakis
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
@bors r+ |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
labels
Jan 2, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
labels
Jan 3, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
@bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
labels
Jan 3, 2019
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
cjgillot commentedNov 15, 2018
•
edited
Hello,
By following @eddyb's advise on issue #45510, I managed to have the snippets of code in #45510 and #18952 passing without breaking older diagnostics.
EDIT: the codegen tests breakage I experienced is due to the poor quality of my laptop.
If any kind reviewer has any advice, you are very welcome.