Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prepare beta 1.33.0, take 2 #57696

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 18, 2019
Merged

Prepare beta 1.33.0, take 2 #57696

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 18, 2019

Conversation

pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

This PR includes the usual changes for a new beta, and suppresses a few lints on libcore: those lints are false positives caused by an internal attribute (rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start) and only happen on stage0.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

Note: recreated to avoid issues with the old PR.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!
  • These commits modify submodules.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 17, 2019
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum p=10

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 17, 2019

📌 Commit b54a00a has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 17, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 17, 2019

⌛ Testing commit b54a00a with merge 19229770a30a8e05c7ece9d0e8dbf3ea8c63118c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 17, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 17, 2019
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-tools of your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.
[01:48:16] {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"window/progress","params":{"done":true,"id":"progress_3","title":"Building"}}Content-Length: 92
[01:48:16] 
[01:48:16] {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"window/progress","params":{"id":"progress_2","title":"Indexing"}}Content-Length: 444
[01:48:16] 
[01:48:16] {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"textDocument/publishDiagnostics","params":{"diagnostics":[{"code":"E0425","message":"cannot find function `fetch_u32` in module `library`\n\nnot found in `library`","range":{"end":{"character":53,"line":4},"start":{"character":44,"line":4}},"severity":1,"source":"rustc"}],"uri":"file:///checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/rlsit/t2/simple_workspace/binary/src/main.rs"}}Content-Length: 681
[01:48:16] {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"textDocument/publishDiagnostics","params":{"diagnostics":[{"code":"unused_variables","message":"unused variable: `unused`\n\nnote: #[warn(unused_variables)] on by default\nhelp: consider using `_unused` instead: `_unused`","range":{"end":{"character":30,"line":2},"start":{"character":24,"line":2}},"severity":2,"source":"rustc"},{"code":"E0308","message":"mismatched types\n\nexpected u32, found u64","range":{"end":{"character":62,"line":9},"start":{"character":44,"line":9}},"severity":1,"source":"rustc"}],"uri":"file:///checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/rlsit/t2/simple_workspace/library/src/lib.rs"}}Content-Length: 104
[01:48:16] 
[01:48:16] {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"window/progress","params":{"done":true,"id":"progress_2","title":"Indexing"}}
[01:48:16] ---------------
---
travis_time:end:0fd5577e:start=1547749176362444622,finish=1547749176368963693,duration=6519071
travis_fold:end:after_failure.3
travis_fold:start:after_failure.4
travis_time:start:023b0734
$ ln -s . checkout && for CORE in obj/cores/core.*; do EXE=$(echo $CORE | sed 's|obj/cores/core\.[0-9]*\.!checkout!\(.*\)|\1|;y|!|/|'); if [ -f "$EXE" ]; then printf travis_fold":start:crashlog\n\033[31;1m%s\033[0m\n" "$CORE"; gdb --batch -q -c "$CORE" "$EXE" -iex 'set auto-load off' -iex 'dir src/' -iex 'set sysroot .' -ex bt -ex q; echo travis_fold":"end:crashlog; fi; done || true
travis_fold:end:after_failure.4
travis_fold:start:after_failure.5
travis_time:start:03316a94
travis_time:start:03316a94
$ cat ./obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/asan/build/lib/asan/clang_rt.asan-dynamic-i386.vers || true
cat: ./obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/asan/build/lib/asan/clang_rt.asan-dynamic-i386.vers: No such file or directory
travis_fold:end:after_failure.5
travis_fold:start:after_failure.6
travis_time:start:10fd1b0c
$ dmesg | grep -i kill

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 17, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 17, 2019

⌛ Testing commit b54a00a with merge d1add97...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2019
Prepare beta 1.33.0, take 2

This PR includes the usual changes for a new beta, and suppresses a few lints on libcore: those lints are false positives caused by an internal attribute (rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start) and only happen on stage0.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

*Note: recreated to avoid issues with the old PR.*
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 18, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing d1add97 to beta...

@bors bors merged commit b54a00a into beta Jan 18, 2019
@pietroalbini pietroalbini deleted the beta-next branch February 26, 2019 08:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants