Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix cfg(test) build for x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx #61503

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2019

Conversation

jethrogb
Copy link
Contributor

@jethrogb jethrogb commented Jun 3, 2019

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @bluss

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 3, 2019
@jethrogb
Copy link
Contributor Author

jethrogb commented Jun 5, 2019

r? @alexcrichton

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned alexcrichton and unassigned bluss Jun 5, 2019
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 5, 2019

📌 Commit a3d5e34 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 5, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2019
…chton

Fix cfg(test) build for x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #61503 (Fix cfg(test) build for x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx)
 - #61534 (Edit docs of ExitStatus)
 - #61536 (Don't allow using const fn arguments as "args_required_const")
 - #61538 (Don't use GNU noexec stack note)
 - #61546 (azure: Fix some minor issues which have broken our configuration )

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit a3d5e34 into rust-lang:master Jun 5, 2019
@jethrogb
Copy link
Contributor Author

jethrogb commented Jun 7, 2019

Please nominate this for beta-backport. This is the second time beta branched from master with SGX not building and/or passing tests.

@Centril Centril added beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 13, 2019
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

discussed at T-compiler meeting. Accepted for beta-backport.

@pnkfelix pnkfelix added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Jun 20, 2019
@pietroalbini pietroalbini removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Jun 22, 2019
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2019
[beta] Rollup backports

Rolled up:

* [beta] Comment out dev key #61700

Cherry picked:

* Dont ICE on an attempt to use GAT without feature gate #61118
* Fix cfg(test) build for x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx #61503
* Handle index out of bound errors during const eval without panic #61598
* Hygienize macros in the standard library #61629
* Fix ICE involving mut references #61947
* rustc_typeck: correctly compute `Substs` for `Res::SelfCtor`. #61896
* Revert "Set test flag when rustdoc is running with --test option" #61199
* create a "provisional cache" to restore performance in the case of cycles #61754

r? @ghost
@workingjubilee workingjubilee added the O-SGX Target: SGX label Jul 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. O-SGX Target: SGX S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants