Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only call the closure parameter of Iterator::is_sorted_by_key once per item #62473

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2019
Merged

Only call the closure parameter of Iterator::is_sorted_by_key once per item #62473

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2019

Conversation

timvermeulen
Copy link
Contributor

See #53485 (comment).

This changes Iterator::is_sorted_by_key to only call the given closure once for each item, which allows us to pass the items to the closure by value instead of by reference.

Important: is_sorted_by_key for slices and slice iterators is now no longer implemented in terms of the custom slice::Iter::is_sorted_by implementation. It's a trade-off: we could forward slice::Iter::is_sorted_by_key to it directly for potential SIMD benefits, but that would mean that the closure is potentially called twice for (almost) every element of the slice.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @aidanhs

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 7, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Jul 7, 2019

r? @scottmcm

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned scottmcm and unassigned aidanhs Jul 7, 2019
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

scottmcm commented Jul 8, 2019

Well, this seems reasonable to me and the signature change is unstable so if libs is unhappy with it we can always revert it 🙃, so

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 8, 2019

📌 Commit 98b54fb has been approved by scottmcm

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 8, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 8, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 98b54fb with merge 78ca1bd...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2019
Only call the closure parameter of Iterator::is_sorted_by_key once per item

See #53485 (comment).

This changes `Iterator::is_sorted_by_key` to only call the given closure once for each item, which allows us to pass the items to the closure by value instead of by reference.

**Important**: `is_sorted_by_key` for slices and slice iterators is now no longer implemented in terms of the custom `slice::Iter::is_sorted_by` implementation. It's a trade-off: we could forward `slice::Iter::is_sorted_by_key` to it directly for potential SIMD benefits, but that would mean that the closure is potentially called twice for (almost) every element of the slice.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 8, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure, checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: scottmcm
Pushing 78ca1bd to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants