Document that the crate keyword refers to the project root #62595
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @withoutboats (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
📌 Commit d4fcbb4 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2019
Document that the crate keyword refers to the project root :wave: this is my first rust contribution so I hope I'm doing everything correctly. Help very much appreciated if I'm not. As far as I can tell this use of `crate` is only documented [in the edition guide for rust 2018](https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2018/module-system/path-clarity.html#the-crate-keyword-refers-to-the-current-crate). However it should probably be in the documentation for the `crate` keyword itself. This adds that documentation.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2019
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #61535 (Coherence test when a generic type param has a default value from an associated type) - #62274 (rustc_mir: follow FalseUnwind's real_target edge in qualify_consts.) - #62431 (Add messages to `Option`'s and `Result`'s `must_use` annotation for `is_*`) - #62453 (in which we suggest anonymizing single-use lifetimes in paths ) - #62568 (Replace unsafe_destructor_blind_to_params with may_dangle) - #62578 (Add test for #49919) - #62595 (Document that the crate keyword refers to the project root) - #62599 (move mem::uninitialized deprecation back by 1 release, to 1.39) - #62605 (Emit dropped unemitted errors to aid in ICE debugging) - #62607 (Correctly break out of recovery loop) - #62608 (`async unsafe fn` tests) - #62623 (downgrade indirect_structural_match lint to allow) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
👋 this is my first rust contribution so I hope I'm doing everything correctly. Help very much appreciated if I'm not.
As far as I can tell this use of
crateis only documented in the edition guide for rust 2018. However it should probably be in the documentation for thecratekeyword itself. This adds that documentation.