Skip to content

Conversation

estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@estebank estebank commented Aug 9, 2019

CC #39703

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @zackmdavis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 9, 2019
@zackmdavis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 9, 2019

📌 Commit b9865d9 has been approved by zackmdavis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 9, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2019
Mention that tuple structs are private if any of their fields are

CC rust-lang#39703
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2019
Mention that tuple structs are private if any of their fields are

CC rust-lang#39703
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2019
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #63056 (Give built-in macros stable addresses in the standard library)
 - #63337 (Tweak mismatched types error)
 - #63350 (Use associated_type_bounds where applicable - closes #61738)
 - #63394 (Add test for issue 36804)
 - #63399 (More explicit diagnostic when using a `vec![]` in a pattern)
 - #63419 (check against more collisions for TypeId of fn pointer)
 - #63423 (Mention that tuple structs are private if any of their fields are)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit b9865d9 into rust-lang:master Aug 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants