Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 14 pull requests #65716

Merged
merged 43 commits into from
Oct 23, 2019
Merged

Rollup of 14 pull requests #65716

merged 43 commits into from
Oct 23, 2019

Conversation

JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

BO41 and others added 30 commits October 2, 2019 17:55
to better describe the situation
This makes a few code cleanups to follow up on the review comments in
rust-lang#65576.
…doc, r=ehuss

Target-feature documented as unsafe

@nikomatsakis asked me to help out on the docs on this issue: rust-lang#63597

The following docs have been modified
- ```rustc -C help``` text for `target-feature`
- RustC book:

## Preview of src/doc/rustc/src/targets/index.md
![Screenshot 2019-09-17 at 12 22 45](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/13764830/65033746-f7826700-d945-11e9-9dd2-d8f9b08f45de.png)

## Preview of src/doc/rustc/src/targets/known-issues.md
![Screenshot 2019-09-17 at 12 22 25](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/13764830/65033774-00733880-d946-11e9-9398-90f01f3938d5.png)

Fixes rust-lang#63597
Mention keyword closing policy

closes rust-lang#59233 / rust-lang#59233 (comment)

rewording suggestions welcome

> Also in the referenced issue, the commit number of the new commit
> that could close that issue is not really informative. The PR number itself appeared in the issue
> is more informative and concise.

@lzutao what do you mean with that? Is this fixed by the new "May be fixed by #XXXXX"?
…komatsakis

Add more coherence tests

I've wrote the missing test cases listed in [this google doc](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WlroTEXE6qxxGvEOhICkUpqguYZP9YOZEvnmEtSNtM0/edit#gid=0)

> The other thing that might be useful is to rename the existing tests so they all fit the new naming scheme we were using.

I'm not entirely sure how to do this. If everything from the google sheet is covered could I just remove the remaining tests in `src/test/ui/coherence` or is there something in there that should remain?

cc rust-lang#63599

r? @nikomatsakis
Fix test style in unused parentheses lint test

I think this fixes rust-lang#63237
I'm not sure if I had to add text after the `//~ ERROR` comments.
This is my first pull request, so I'm open to feedback.
This issues already received one pull request [here](rust-lang#63257) but it was marked as closed for inactivity.

r?  @nikomatsakis
…-E0588, r=Dylan-DPC

Add long error explanation for E0588

Part of rust-lang#61137.

r? @kinnison
Fix WASI sleep impl

Closes rust-lang#65607

@sunfishcode
Is it fine to use 0 for the `identifier` field? What is this field used for?
…cut, r=Dylan-DPC

Add option to disable keyboard shortcuts in docs

Fixes rust-lang#65211.

r? @Manishearth
…GuilliaumeGomez

Add long error explanation for E0728

Part of rust-lang#61137

r? @GuillaumeGomez
Code cleanups following up on rust-lang#65576.

This makes a few code cleanups to follow up on the review comments in
rust-lang#65576.

r? @Centril
Add some tests for fixed ICEs

Fixes rust-lang#41366 from 1.35.0
Fixes rust-lang#51431 from 1.31.0-nightly (77af314 2018-10-11) (on my local)
Fixes rust-lang#52437 from nightly
Fixes rust-lang#63496 from nightly

r? @Centril
bring back some Debug instances for Miri

These were erroneously removed in rust-lang#65647, but Miri needs them.

r? @Centril Cc @nnethercote @oli-obk
…-work-item-event-names, r=wesleywiser

self-profiling: Remove module names from some event-ids in codegen backend.

Event-IDs are not supposed to contain argument values. Event-IDs are the equivalent of function names. Proper support for parameters will be added to self-profiling down the line.

This PR fixes an oversight from rust-lang#64840.

r? @wesleywiser
…mulacrum

Add missing space in librustdoc

It just hurts my eyes...

r? @Centril
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=14

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 23, 2019

📌 Commit 1df9081 has been approved by JohnTitor

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 23, 2019
@JohnTitor JohnTitor added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 23, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 23, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 1df9081 with merge f466f52...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2019
Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #64145 (Target-feature documented as unsafe)
 - #65007 (Mention keyword closing policy)
 - #65417 (Add more coherence tests)
 - #65507 (Fix test style in unused parentheses lint test)
 - #65591 (Add long error explanation for E0588)
 - #65617 (Fix WASI sleep impl)
 - #65656 (Add option to disable keyboard shortcuts in docs)
 - #65678 (Add long error explanation for E0728)
 - #65681 (Code cleanups following up on #65576.)
 - #65686 (refactor and move `maybe_append` )
 - #65688 (Add some tests for fixed ICEs)
 - #65689 (bring back some Debug instances for Miri)
 - #65695 (self-profiling: Remove module names from some event-ids in codegen backend.)
 - #65706 (Add missing space in librustdoc)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 23, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: JohnTitor
Pushing f466f52 to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet