Rollup of 5 pull requests #66185
Closed
Rollup of 5 pull requests #66185
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add ERROR Co-Authored-By: Mazdak Farrokhzad <twingoow@gmail.com>
Have tidy ensure that we document all `unsafe` blocks in libcore cc @rust-lang/libs I documented a few and added ignore flags on the other files. We can incrementally document the files, but won't regress any files this way.
…, r=kinnison [rustdoc] add sub settings This PR is to give a finer control over what types are automatically expanded or not as well as the possibility to add sub-settings in the settings page.  r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Stabilize --extern flag without a path. This stabilizes the `--extern` flag without a path, implemented in rust-lang#54116. This flag is used to add a crate that may be found in the search path to the extern prelude. The intent of stabilizing this now is to change Cargo to emit this flag for `proc_macro` when building a proc-macro crate. This will allow the ability to elide `extern crate proc_macro;` for proc-macros, one of the few places where it is still necessary. It is intended that Cargo may also use this flag for other cases in the future as part of the [std-aware work](https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware/). There will likely be some kind of syntax where users may declare dependencies on other crates (such as `alloc`), and Cargo will use this flag so that they may be used like any other crate. At this time there are no short-term plans to use it for anything other than proc-macro. This will not help for non-proc-macro crates that use `proc_macro`, which I believe is not too common? An alternate approach for proc-macro is to use the `meta` crate, but from my inquiries there doesn't appear to be anyone interested in pushing that forward. The `meta` crate also doesn't help with things like `alloc` or `test`. cc rust-lang#57288
consistent handling of missing sysroot spans Due to rust-lang#53081, sysroot spans (pointing to code in libcore/libstd/...) fails to print on some x86 runners. This consolidates the ignore directives for that and references the relevant issue. I also did that for the generated derive-error-span tests -- but there the script and the tests were not entirely in sync any more since rust-lang#64151. Cc @estebank @varkor
invalid_value lint: fix help text Now that we also warn about `MaybUninit::uninit().assume_init()`, just telling people "use `MaybeUninit`" isn't always sufficient. And anyway this seems like an important enough point to mention it here.
|
@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit b94543b has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit b94543b with merge 90cbb9959e354780941ede793ab05d780e1d0b10... |
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-azure |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
unsafeblocks in libcore #63793 (Have tidy ensure that we document allunsafeblocks in libcore)Failed merges:
r? @ghost