Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put back tidy check on error codes #66777

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2019
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

I just realized that the tidy checks were not run anymore on the error code long explanations. This add it back.

cc @Dylan-DPC
r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 26, 2019
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Updated.

.file_name()
.unwrap()
.to_string_lossy() != "error_codes" {
// We don't want to check all ".md" files, just the long error code explanation ones.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be amazing to say why here -- something like "they're currently largely not compliant" or something along those lines.

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 27, 2019
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@Mark-Simulacrum Is the wording better?

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 27, 2019

📌 Commit 5bb70c1 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Nov 27, 2019
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2019
…rk-Simulacrum

Put back tidy check on error codes

I just realized that the tidy checks were not run anymore on the error code long explanations. This add it back.

cc @Dylan-DPC
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2019
Rollup of 17 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #64325 (Stabilize nested self receivers in 1.41.0)
 - #66222 (Use `eq_opaque_type_and_type` when type-checking closure signatures)
 - #66305 (Add by-value arrays to `improper_ctypes` lint)
 - #66399 (rustc_metadata: simplify the interactions between Lazy and Table.)
 - #66534 (Allow global references via ForeignItem and Item for the same symbol name during LLVM codegen)
 - #66700 (Fix pointing at arg for fulfillment errors in function calls)
 - #66704 (Intra doc enum variant field)
 - #66718 (Refactor `parse_enum_item` to use `parse_delim_comma_seq`)
 - #66722 (Handle non_exhaustive in borrow checking)
 - #66744 (Fix shrink_to panic documentation)
 - #66761 (Use LLVMDisposePassManager instead of raw delete in rustllvm)
 - #66769 (Add core::{f32,f64}::consts::TAU.)
 - #66774 (Clean up error codes)
 - #66777 (Put back tidy check on error codes)
 - #66797 (Fixes small typo in array docs r? @steveklabnik)
 - #66798 (Fix spelling typos)
 - #66800 (Combine similar tests for const match)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 5bb70c1 into rust-lang:master Nov 28, 2019
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the tidy-err-codes branch November 28, 2019 09:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants