Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not disable field reordering on enums with big discriminant #70748

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2020

Conversation

ogoffart
Copy link
Contributor

@ogoffart ogoffart commented Apr 3, 2020

The field are always re-ordered to minimize padding, regardless of the
alignment of the discriminant

(spinoff from #70477)

The field are always re-ordered to minimize padding, regardless of the
alignment of the discriminant
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @matthewjasper

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 3, 2020
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Apr 3, 2020

r? @eddyb

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned eddyb and unassigned matthewjasper Apr 3, 2020
@@ -104,6 +127,8 @@ pub fn main() {
assert_eq!(size_of::<e3>(), 4 as usize);
assert_eq!(size_of::<ReorderedStruct>(), 4);
assert_eq!(size_of::<ReorderedEnum>(), 6);
assert_eq!(size_of::<ReorderedEnum2>(), 8);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the record, before this PR it was 12.

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Apr 4, 2020

FWIW, this has some more details #70477 (comment).

My reasoning is that the discriminant "commutes" with the group of fields right next to it, which have lower alignment, without changes in padding. I believe this doesn't hold for descending sorting (by alignment), but only ascending sorting, of variant fields (it's the latter we do for enums).

I haven't fully looked into what other implications partially-sorted field orders have.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 4, 2020

📌 Commit 6b6cb7b has been approved by eddyb

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 4, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2020
Do not disable field reordering on enums with big discriminant

The field are always re-ordered to minimize padding, regardless of the
alignment of the discriminant

(spinoff from rust-lang#70477)
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2020
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#70635 (rustc_target: Some cleanup to `no_default_libraries`)
 - rust-lang#70748 (Do not disable field reordering on enums with big discriminant)
 - rust-lang#70752 (Add slice::fill)
 - rust-lang#70766 (use ManuallyDrop instead of forget inside collections)
 - rust-lang#70768 (macro_rules: `NtLifetime` cannot start with an identifier)
 - rust-lang#70783 (comment refers to removed type)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 630414d into rust-lang:master Apr 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants