Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unused single_step flag #71128

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2020
Merged

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

This appears to have never been used ever since its introduction in 61c7569 --
the plugin discussed on the PR introducing that commit, 34811, never
materialized.

It's also simple to re-add in the current scheme, but given that macro expansion
is already quite complicated, additional useless state seems good to remove
while we're not using it.

This appears to have never been used ever since its introduction in 61c7569 --
the plugin discussed on the PR introducing that commit, 34811, never
materialized.

It's also simple to readd in the current scheme, but given that macro expansion
is already quite complicated, additional useless state seems good to remove
while we're not using it.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @davidtwco

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 14, 2020
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 14, 2020

📌 Commit a0d4c74 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 14, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2020
…petrochenkov

Remove unused single_step flag

This appears to have never been used ever since its introduction in 61c7569 --
the plugin discussed on the PR introducing that commit, 34811, never
materialized.

It's also simple to re-add in the current scheme, but given that macro expansion
is already quite complicated, additional useless state seems good to remove
while we're not using it.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#70657 (Allow `try`-blocks in places where an open delim is expected)
 - rust-lang#70947 (tighten CTFE safety net for accesses to globals)
 - rust-lang#70949 (simplify `vec!` macro)
 - rust-lang#71002 (fix target & runtool args order)
 - rust-lang#71082 (ptr: introduce len() method on raw slices)
 - rust-lang#71128 (Remove unused single_step flag)
 - rust-lang#71133 (Tighten time complexity on the doc of sort_by_key)
 - rust-lang#71135 (Update books)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit d5aff41 into rust-lang:master Apr 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants