Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typos in docs for keyword "in" #71535

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2020

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Erroneous .md formatting was causing the link to not work on the currently-nightly keyword docs for in, and also there was a simple typo.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 24, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 24, 2020

📌 Commit 0689efc has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 24, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#69456 (fix misleading type annotation diagonstics)
 - rust-lang#71330 (Only run dataflow for const qualification if type-based check would fail)
 - rust-lang#71480 (Improve PanicInfo examples readability)
 - rust-lang#71485 (Add BinaryHeap::retain as suggested in rust-lang#42849)
 - rust-lang#71512 (Remove useless "" args)
 - rust-lang#71527 (Miscellaneous cleanup in `check_consts`)
 - rust-lang#71534 (Avoid unused Option::map results)
 - rust-lang#71535 (Fix typos in docs for keyword "in")

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 32fb77d into rust-lang:master Apr 25, 2020
@workingjubilee workingjubilee deleted the jubilee-markdown-fix branch April 25, 2020 03:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants