Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use futex-based thread::park/unpark on Linux. #76919

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 1, 2020

Conversation

m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

@m-ou-se m-ou-se commented Sep 19, 2020

This moves the parking/unparking logic out of thread/mod.rs into a module named thread_parker in sys_common. The current implementation is moved to sys_common/thread_parker/generic.rs and the new implementation using futexes is added in sys_common/thread_parker/futex.rs.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @kennytm

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 19, 2020
@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Sep 19, 2020

r? @dtolnay

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned dtolnay and unassigned kennytm Sep 19, 2020
@m-ou-se m-ou-se changed the title Use futex-based thread::park/unpark on Linux. Use futex-based thread::park/unpark on Linux and Windows. Sep 19, 2020
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member Author

m-ou-se commented Sep 19, 2020

Hm, looks like WaitOnAddress is only available on Windows 8+, but the Rust documentation promises tier 1 support for Windows 7+. Reverting the Windows part for now.

@m-ou-se m-ou-se changed the title Use futex-based thread::park/unpark on Linux and Windows. Use futex-based thread::park/unpark on Linux. Sep 19, 2020
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member Author

m-ou-se commented Sep 24, 2020

@rustbot modify labels: +T-libs +A-concurrency +O-linux

@rustbot rustbot added A-concurrency Area: Concurrency related issues. O-linux Operating system: Linux T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 24, 2020
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, this is fantastic.

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Oct 1, 2020

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 1, 2020

📌 Commit 0b73fd7 has been approved by dtolnay

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 1, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 1, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 0b73fd7 with merge 7820135...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 1, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-azure
Approved by: dtolnay
Pushing 7820135 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 1, 2020
@bors bors merged commit 7820135 into rust-lang:master Oct 1, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.48.0 milestone Oct 1, 2020
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

📣 Toolstate changed by #76919!

Tested on commit 7820135.
Direct link to PR: #76919

💔 miri on linux: test-pass → test-fail (cc @oli-obk @eddyb @RalfJung).

rust-highfive added a commit to rust-lang-nursery/rust-toolstate that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2020
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@7820135.
Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#76919>

💔 miri on linux: test-pass → test-fail (cc @oli-obk @eddyb @RalfJung).
@m-ou-se m-ou-se deleted the thread-parker branch December 6, 2020 00:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-concurrency Area: Concurrency related issues. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. O-linux Operating system: Linux S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants