Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 15 pull requests #78319

Merged
merged 40 commits into from
Oct 24, 2020
Merged

Rollup of 15 pull requests #78319

merged 40 commits into from
Oct 24, 2020

Conversation

jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

francesca64 and others added 30 commits October 7, 2020 15:46
When a range has finished iteration, `is_empty` returns true, so it
should also be the case that `contains` returns false.
This removes a cause of `unwrap` and code complexity.

This allows replacing

```
option_value = Some(build());
option_value.as_mut().unwrap()
```

with

```
option_value.insert(build())
```

or

```
option_value.insert_with(build)
```

It's also useful in contexts not requiring the mutability of the reference.

Here's a typical cache example:

```
let checked_cache = cache.as_ref().filter(|e| e.is_valid());
let content = match checked_cache {
	Some(e) => &e.content,
	None => {
	    cache = Some(compute_cache_entry());
	    // unwrap is OK because we just filled the option
	    &cache.as_ref().unwrap().content
	}
};
```

It can be changed into

```
let checked_cache = cache.as_ref().filter(|e| e.is_valid());
let content = match checked_cache {
	Some(e) => &e.content,
	None => &cache.insert_with(compute_cache_entry).content,
};
```
`option.insert` covers both needs anyway, `insert_with` is
redundant.
Code cleaning made according to suggestions in discussion
on PR ##77392 impacts insert, get_or_insert and get_or_insert_with.
Co-authored-by: Mara Bos <m-ou.se@m-ou.se>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Tham <pickfire@riseup.net>
An empty enum is similar to the never type `!`, rather than the unit type `()`.
Addresses Issue #78286

Libraries compiled with coverage and linked with out enabling coverage
would fail when attempting to add the library's coverage statements to
the codegen coverage context (None).

Now, if coverage statements are encountered while compiling / linking
with `-Z instrument-coverage` disabled, codegen will *not* attempt to
add code regions to a coverage map, and it will not inject the LLVM
instrprof_increment intrinsic calls.
Co-authored-by: Wesley Wiser <wwiser@gmail.com>
Add a spin loop hint for Arc::downgrade

Adds `hint::spin_loop()` to the case where `Arc::downgrade` spins.
add `insert` to `Option`

This removes a cause of `unwrap` and code complexity.

This allows replacing

```
option_value = Some(build());
option_value.as_mut().unwrap()
```

with

```
option_value.insert(build())
```

It's also useful in contexts not requiring the mutability of the reference.

Here's a typical cache example:

```
let checked_cache = cache.as_ref().filter(|e| e.is_valid());
let content = match checked_cache {
	Some(e) => &e.content,
	None => {
	    cache = Some(compute_cache_entry());
	    // unwrap is OK because we just filled the option
	    &cache.as_ref().unwrap().content
	}
};
```

It can be changed into

```
let checked_cache = cache.as_ref().filter(|e| e.is_valid());
let content = match checked_cache {
	Some(e) => &e.content,
	None => &cache.insert(compute_cache_entry()).content,
};
```

*(edited: I removed `insert_with`)*
…nas-schievink

Revert "Allow dynamic linking for iOS/tvOS targets."

This reverts PR #73516.

On macOS I compile static libs for iOS, automated using [cargo-mobile](https://github.com/BrainiumLLC/cargo-mobile), which has worked smoothly for the past 2 years. However, upon updating to Rust 1.46.0, I was no longer able to use Rust on iOS. I've bisected this to the PR referenced above.

For most projects tested, apps now immediately crash with a message like this:
```
dyld: Library not loaded: /Users/francesca/Projects/example/target/aarch64-apple-ios/debug/deps/libexample.dylib
  Referenced from: /private/var/containers/Bundle/Application/745912AF-A928-465C-B340-872BD1C9F368/example.app/example
  Reason: image not found
dyld: launch, loading dependent libraries
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/system/introspection
DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES=/Developer/usr/lib/libBacktraceRecording.dylib:/Developer/usr/lib/libMainThreadChecker.dylib:/Developer/Library/PrivateFrameworks/DTDDISupport.framework/libViewDebuggerSupport.dylib:/Developer/Library/PrivateFrameworks/GPUTools.framework/libglInterpose.dylib:/usr/lib/libMTLCapture.dylib
```

This can be reproduced by using cargo-mobile to generate a winit example project, and then attempting to run it on an iOS device (`cargo mobile init && cargo apple open`).

In our projects that depend on DisplayLink, the build instead fails with a linker error:
```
= note: Undefined symbols for architecture arm64:
            "_CACurrentMediaTime", referenced from:
                display_link::ios::run_callback_ios10::hda81197ff46aedbd in libapp-4f0abc1d7684103f.rlib(app-4f0abc1d7684103f.40d4iro0yz1iy487.rcgu.o)
                display_link::ios::run_callback_pre_ios10::h91f085da19374320 in libapp-4f0abc1d7684103f.rlib(app-4f0abc1d7684103f.40d4iro0yz1iy487.rcgu.o)
          ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture arm64
```

After reverting the change to enable dynamic linking on iOS, everything works the same as it did on Rust 1.45.2 for me.

In the future, would it be possible for me to be pinged when iOS-related PRs are made? I work for a company that intends on using Rust on iOS in production, so I'd gladly provide testing.

cc @aspenluxxxy
Check for exhaustion in RangeInclusive::contains and slicing

When a range has finished iteration, `is_empty` returns true, so it
should also be the case that `contains` returns false.

Fixes #77941.
Simplify assert terminator only if condition evaluates to expected value
--test-args flag description

tiny enhancement/clarification for the help description of the `--test-args` option from `x.py test` subcommand.

Edit: ...as discussed in zulip [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/122651-general/topic/x.2Epy.20run.20single.20unit.20test.3F/near/214107842)
improve const infer error

For type inference we probably have to be careful about subtyping and stuff but considering that subtyping shouldn't be relevant for constants I don't really see a reason why we may not want to reuse the const origin here.

r? `@varkor`
Add regression test for issue-77475

Closes #77475
Update description of Empty Enum for accuracy

An empty enum is similar to the never type `!`, rather than the unit type `()`.
move `visit_predicate` into `TypeVisitor`

Seems easier than dealing with `PredicateVisitor` for me which I needed for object safety checks for `PredicateAtom::ConstEvaluatable`. Is there a reason I am missing for this split?

r? @matthewjasper
Loop instead of recursion

I saw the comment `// FIXME: consider not using recursion to lower this.` and considered not using recursion :)
Always store Rustdoc theme when it's changed

`switchTheme` (too) lazily updated the value of `rustdoc-theme` in `localStorage`, leading to an incorrect stored value when the system theme is the same as the default (`light`) theme.

Fixes #78273
Make codegen coverage_context optional, and check

Addresses Issue #78286

Libraries compiled with coverage and linked with out enabling coverage
would fail when attempting to add the library's coverage statements to
the codegen coverage context (None).

Now, if coverage statements are encountered while compiling / linking
with `-Z instrument-coverage` disabled, codegen will *not* attempt to
add code regions to a coverage map, and it will not inject the LLVM
instrprof_increment intrinsic calls.
Revert "Set .llvmbc and .llvmcmd sections as allocatable"

Reverts #77961, see discussion starting from #77961 (comment)
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=15

@rustbot modify labels: rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2020

📌 Commit 1ac137b has been approved by jonas-schievink

@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2020
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 24, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 1ac137b with merge 89fdb30...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jonas-schievink
Pushing 89fdb30 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 24, 2020
@bors bors merged commit 89fdb30 into rust-lang:master Oct 24, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.49.0 milestone Oct 24, 2020
@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink deleted the rollup-vzj8a6l branch October 24, 2020 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet