Various ABI refactorings #80594
Merged
Various ABI refactorings #80594
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bjorn3
added
A-codegen
|
The rust abi changes may have a perf impact. @bors try @rust-timer queue |
|
Awaiting bors try build completion. |
|
⌛ Trying commit aa907768403aacd3b5750b496ad5823891176e3d with merge 075e7afe5cd922c1d7be743e49df45cb2d3646ad... |
|
Awaiting bors try build completion. |
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
|
Queued 075e7afe5cd922c1d7be743e49df45cb2d3646ad with parent 206ee1e, future comparison URL. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-perf
|
Overall this is a slight (<0.5%) improvement. |
|
Finished benchmarking try commit (075e7afe5cd922c1d7be743e49df45cb2d3646ad): comparison url. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up. @bors rollup=never |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
…n return position Abi::ScalarPair is only ever used for types that don't have a stable layout anyway so this doesn't break any FFI. It does however reduce the amount of special casing on the abi outside of the code responsible for abi specific adjustments to the pass mode.
…s mode for a type
|
I think this is enough to port cg_clif to the same abi handling infrastructure as cg_llvm. Randomly assigning |
|
I'm not familiar with this code and not sure what are the full implications of da0309c, but this looks reasonable. |
petrochenkov
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
I am not sure about da0309c either, but it is probably the reason this PR improves performance and it removes a special case so I would like to see it landing, but I would like for someone who is more familiar with the abi handling to take a look. |
bjorn3
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit fa12fdb has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
I believe this has caused a breaking change in wasm32-unknown-unknown's ABI -- #81386 |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2023
Ensure sanity of all computed ABIs This moves the ABI sanity assertions from the codegen backend to the ABI computation logic. Sadly, due to past mistakes, we [have to](rust-lang#117351 (comment)) be able to compute a sane ABI for nonsensical function types like `extern "C" fn(str) -> str`. So to make the sanity check pass we first need to make all ABI adjustment deal with unsized types... and we have no shared infrastructure for those adjustments, so that's a bunch of copy-paste. At least we have assertions failing loudly when one accidentally sets a different mode for an unsized argument. To achieve this, this re-lands the parts of rust-lang#80594 that got reverted in rust-lang#81388. To avoid breaking wasm ABI again, that ABI now explicitly opts-in to the (wrong, broken) ABI that we currently keep for backwards compatibility. That's still better than having *every* ABI use the wrong broken default! Cc `@bjorn3` Fixes rust-lang#115845
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2023
Ensure sanity of all computed ABIs This moves the ABI sanity assertions from the codegen backend to the ABI computation logic. Sadly, due to past mistakes, we [have to](rust-lang#117351 (comment)) be able to compute a sane ABI for nonsensical function types like `extern "C" fn(str) -> str`. So to make the sanity check pass we first need to make all ABI adjustment deal with unsized types... and we have no shared infrastructure for those adjustments, so that's a bunch of copy-paste. At least we have assertions failing loudly when one accidentally sets a different mode for an unsized argument. To achieve this, this re-lands the parts of rust-lang#80594 that got reverted in rust-lang#81388. To avoid breaking wasm ABI again, that ABI now explicitly opts-in to the (wrong, broken) ABI that we currently keep for backwards compatibility. That's still better than having *every* ABI use the wrong broken default! Cc `@bjorn3` Fixes rust-lang#115845
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2023
Ensure sanity of all computed ABIs This moves the ABI sanity assertions from the codegen backend to the ABI computation logic. Sadly, due to past mistakes, we [have to](rust-lang#117351 (comment)) be able to compute a sane ABI for nonsensical function types like `extern "C" fn(str) -> str`. So to make the sanity check pass we first need to make all ABI adjustment deal with unsized types... and we have no shared infrastructure for those adjustments, so that's a bunch of copy-paste. At least we have assertions failing loudly when one accidentally sets a different mode for an unsized argument. To achieve this, this re-lands the parts of rust-lang#80594 that got reverted in rust-lang#81388. To avoid breaking wasm ABI again, that ABI now explicitly opts-in to the (wrong, broken) ABI that we currently keep for backwards compatibility. That's still better than having *every* ABI use the wrong broken default! Cc `@bjorn3` Fixes rust-lang#115845
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2023
Ensure sanity of all computed ABIs This moves the ABI sanity assertions from the codegen backend to the ABI computation logic. Sadly, due to past mistakes, we [have to](rust-lang/rust#117351 (comment)) be able to compute a sane ABI for nonsensical function types like `extern "C" fn(str) -> str`. So to make the sanity check pass we first need to make all ABI adjustment deal with unsized types... and we have no shared infrastructure for those adjustments, so that's a bunch of copy-paste. At least we have assertions failing loudly when one accidentally sets a different mode for an unsized argument. To achieve this, this re-lands the parts of rust-lang/rust#80594 that got reverted in rust-lang/rust#81388. To avoid breaking wasm ABI again, that ABI now explicitly opts-in to the (wrong, broken) ABI that we currently keep for backwards compatibility. That's still better than having *every* ABI use the wrong broken default! Cc `@bjorn3` Fixes rust-lang/rust#115845
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust-analyzer
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2024
Ensure sanity of all computed ABIs This moves the ABI sanity assertions from the codegen backend to the ABI computation logic. Sadly, due to past mistakes, we [have to](rust-lang/rust#117351 (comment)) be able to compute a sane ABI for nonsensical function types like `extern "C" fn(str) -> str`. So to make the sanity check pass we first need to make all ABI adjustment deal with unsized types... and we have no shared infrastructure for those adjustments, so that's a bunch of copy-paste. At least we have assertions failing loudly when one accidentally sets a different mode for an unsized argument. To achieve this, this re-lands the parts of rust-lang/rust#80594 that got reverted in rust-lang/rust#81388. To avoid breaking wasm ABI again, that ABI now explicitly opts-in to the (wrong, broken) ABI that we currently keep for backwards compatibility. That's still better than having *every* ABI use the wrong broken default! Cc `@bjorn3` Fixes rust-lang/rust#115845
RalfJung
pushed a commit
to RalfJung/rust-analyzer
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2024
Ensure sanity of all computed ABIs This moves the ABI sanity assertions from the codegen backend to the ABI computation logic. Sadly, due to past mistakes, we [have to](rust-lang/rust#117351 (comment)) be able to compute a sane ABI for nonsensical function types like `extern "C" fn(str) -> str`. So to make the sanity check pass we first need to make all ABI adjustment deal with unsized types... and we have no shared infrastructure for those adjustments, so that's a bunch of copy-paste. At least we have assertions failing loudly when one accidentally sets a different mode for an unsized argument. To achieve this, this re-lands the parts of rust-lang/rust#80594 that got reverted in rust-lang/rust#81388. To avoid breaking wasm ABI again, that ABI now explicitly opts-in to the (wrong, broken) ABI that we currently keep for backwards compatibility. That's still better than having *every* ABI use the wrong broken default! Cc `@bjorn3` Fixes rust-lang/rust#115845
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This includes changes to the rust abi and various refactorings that will hopefully make it easier to use the abi handling infrastructure of rustc in cg_clif. There are several refactorings that I haven't done. I am opening this draft PR to check that I haven't broken any non x86_64 architectures.
r? @ghost