Skip to content

Conversation

CAD97
Copy link
Contributor

@CAD97 CAD97 commented Jan 8, 2021

... I don't know how this major typo happened, whoops 🙃

@bors rollup=always
(comment only change)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @m-ou-se

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 8, 2021
@CAD97
Copy link
Contributor Author

CAD97 commented Jan 8, 2021

In the GH review panel, make sure to expand the view downwards to see that this is on fn backward_checked, which obviously should use the predecessor relation, unlike fn forward_checked which uses the successor operation. For some reason they both said successor.

@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Jan 8, 2021

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2021

📌 Commit 02850d3 has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 8, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 9, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 02850d3 with merge ef58949...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 9, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nagisa
Pushing ef58949 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 9, 2021
@bors bors merged commit ef58949 into rust-lang:master Jan 9, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.51.0 milestone Jan 9, 2021
@CAD97 CAD97 deleted the patch-3 branch January 9, 2021 18:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants