Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test for issue #8587, about calling nested functions of the same name #9076

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

bluss
Copy link
Member

@bluss bluss commented Sep 9, 2013

The issue #8587 is fixed (the original testcase now passes); add that testcase to the suite.

Fixes #8587.

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2013
The issue #8587 is fixed (the original testcase now passes); add that testcase to the suite.


Fixes #8587.
@bors bors closed this Sep 10, 2013
Jarcho pushed a commit to Jarcho/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2022
Jarcho pushed a commit to Jarcho/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2022
…, r=flip1995

Fixes [`trait_duplication_in_bounds`] false positives

Fixes rust-lang#9076 rust-lang#9151 rust-lang#8757.
Partially fixes rust-lang#8771.

changelog: [`trait_duplication_in_bounds`]: Reduce number of false positives.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Nested functions are called by name, so the wrong function is called
2 participants