Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #92232

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Dec 23, 2021
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #92232

merged 11 commits into from
Dec 23, 2021

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Milo123459 and others added 11 commits November 5, 2021 18:27
The `AggregateKind` enum ends up in the final mir `Body`. Currently,
any changes to `AdtDef` (regardless of how significant they are)
will legitimately cause the overall result of `optimized_mir` to change,
invalidating any codegen re-use involving that mir.

This will get worse once we start hashing the `Span` inside `FieldDef`
(which is itself contained in `AdtDef`).

To try to reduce these kinds of invalidations, this commit changes
`AggregateKind::Adt` to store just the `DefId`, instead of the full
`AdtDef`. This allows the result of `optimized_mir` to be unchanged
if the `AdtDef` changes in a way that doesn't actually affect any
of the MIR we build.
disable test with self-referential generator on Miri

Running the libcore test suite in Miri currently fails due to the known incompatibility of self-referential generators with Miri's aliasing checks (rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#148). So let's disable that test in Miri for now.
Fixed a small typo in ui test comments
Store a `DefId` instead of an `AdtDef` in `AggregateKind::Adt`

The `AggregateKind` enum ends up in the final mir `Body`. Currently,
any changes to `AdtDef` (regardless of how significant they are)
will legitimately cause the overall result of `optimized_mir` to change,
invalidating any codegen re-use involving that mir.

This will get worse once we start hashing the `Span` inside `FieldDef`
(which is itself contained in `AdtDef`).

To try to reduce these kinds of invalidations, this commit changes
`AggregateKind::Adt` to store just the `DefId`, instead of the full
`AdtDef`. This allows the result of `optimized_mir` to be unchanged
if the `AdtDef` changes in a way that doesn't actually affect any
of the MIR we build.
Update books

## nomicon

1 commits in 49681ea4a9fa81173dbe9ffed74b4d4a35eae9e3..c05c452b36358821bf4122f9c418674edd1d713d
2021-11-24 16:27:28 +0900 to 2021-12-13 15:23:48 +0900
- Update the guidance on uninitialized data with ptr::addr_of_mut (rust-lang/nomicon#325)

## reference

3 commits in 954f3d441ad880737a13e241108f791a4d2a38cd..06f9e61931bcf58b91dfe6c924057e42ce273ee1
2021-11-29 11:11:30 -0800 to 2021-12-17 07:31:40 -0800
- keep consistent for primitive types (rust-lang/reference#1118)
- README.md: link to mdbook docs (rust-lang/reference#1117)
- Say that `...` range patterns are rejected in the 2021 edition (rust-lang/reference#1114)

## book

4 commits in 5f9358faeb1f46e19b8a23a21e79fd7fe150491e..8a0bb3c96e71927b80fa2286d7a5a5f2547c6aa4
2021-12-05 21:33:16 -0500 to 2021-12-22 20:54:27 -0500
- Propagate edits back
- Fix number disagreement. Fixes rust-lang/book#2858.
- Wrap some code in main to make scopes clearer. Fixes rust-lang/book#2830.
- Respond to ch5 nostarch edits

## rustc-dev-guide

9 commits in a374e7d8bb6b79de45b92295d06b4ac0ef35bc09..9bf0028b557798ddd07a6f652e4d0c635d3d6620
2021-12-03 09:26:47 -0800 to 2021-12-20 21:53:57 +0900
- remove rustfix item in test intro (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1277)
- Move date-check comment to fix Markdown syntax
- Update humor docs for special-casing ferris emoji
- Fix some broken links (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1274)
- Update rustdoc internals
- Update HIR chapter to use `HirId` instead of `NodeId`
- Fix some broken links
- Update src/getting-started.md
- Improve documentation on r?
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 23, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 23, 2021

📌 Commit 996fb28 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Dec 23, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 23, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 996fb28 with merge c09a952...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 23, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing c09a952 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 23, 2021
@bors bors merged commit c09a952 into rust-lang:master Dec 23, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Dec 23, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (c09a952): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-eqdac7z branch January 2, 2022 22:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants