Skip to content

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #82528

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 19, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @estebank

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 19, 2022
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

I'm guessing it'd be difficult to find the correct span to suggest .as_ref() inside the tuple? It might also be reasonable to mention .as_ref() in a note instead.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 22, 2022

📌 Commit 306dcd6 has been approved by estebank

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 22, 2022
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor Author

notriddle commented Mar 22, 2022

I'm guessing it'd be difficult to find the correct span to suggest .as_ref() inside the tuple?

Basically, there might not be a correct span.

I would have needed to go back to the THIR and walked the expr tree looking for it, with no guarantee of finding it, so no matter what happens we’ll need a fallback path eventually.

match me() {
    (a, Some(b)) => use(a, b)
}
fn me() -> (Foo, &Option<Bar>) {}
fn use(a: Foo, b: &Bar) {}

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 22, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 306dcd6 with merge 2d15732...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 22, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: estebank
Pushing 2d15732 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 22, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 2d15732 into rust-lang:master Mar 22, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Mar 22, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (2d15732): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/option-content-move-from-tuple-match branch March 22, 2022 18:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Invalid suggestion to consider borrowing Option's content in tuple
6 participants