Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Say "last" instead of "rightmost" in the documentation for std::str:rfind #97192

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2022

Conversation

sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

In the documentation comment for std::str::rfind, say "last" instead
of "rightmost" to describe the match that rfind finds. This follows the
spirit of #30459, for which trim_left and trim_right were replaced by
trim_start and trim_end to be more clear about how they work on
text which is displayed right-to-left.

…:rfind`.

In the documentation comment for `std::str::rfind`, say "last" instead
of "rightmost" to describe the match that `rfind` finds. This follows the
spirit of rust-lang#30459, for which `trim_left` and `trim_right` were replaced by
`trim_start` and `trim_end` to be more clear about how they work on
text which is displayed right-to-left.
@sunfishcode sunfishcode added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 19, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with r? rust-lang/libs-api @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to request review from a libs-api team reviewer. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @thomcc

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 19, 2022
@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented May 19, 2022

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 19, 2022

📌 Commit b836cf6 has been approved by thomcc

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 19, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
…laumeGomez

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#96565 (rustdoc: show implementations on `#[fundamental]` wrappers)
 - rust-lang#97179 (Add new lint to enforce whitespace after keywords)
 - rust-lang#97185 (interpret/validity: separately control checking numbers for being init and non-ptr)
 - rust-lang#97188 (Remove unneeded null pointer asserts in ptr2int casts)
 - rust-lang#97189 (Update .mailmap)
 - rust-lang#97192 (Say "last" instead of "rightmost" in the documentation for `std::str:rfind`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9b25cc0 into rust-lang:master May 20, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone May 20, 2022
@sunfishcode sunfishcode deleted the sunfishcode/rightmost branch May 21, 2022 00:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants