Skip to content

Conversation

patrickoliveira15
Copy link
Contributor

@patrickoliveira15 patrickoliveira15 commented Jan 16, 2025

This PR removes the outdated comment about wfx implies, as the issue has been resolved.

The issue was discussed in rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#2161, and @JohnTitor confirmed that it is fixed:

"Indeed it seems to be fixed, we can remove that text now."

Fixes #2161

@jieyouxu jieyouxu added S-waiting-on-review Status: this PR is waiting for a reviewer to verify its content T-types Relevant to types team labels Jan 16, 2025
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Hey, thank you for the PR! However you should remove the text in https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/solve/invariants.html#wfx-implies-wfnormalizex- instead, see the issue.

@patrickoliveira15 patrickoliveira15 force-pushed the patch/inference-invariance branch from 4f5fdb9 to 2589421 Compare January 16, 2025 15:28
@patrickoliveira15
Copy link
Contributor Author

patrickoliveira15 commented Jan 16, 2025

Hey, thank you for the PR! However you should remove the text in https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/solve/invariants.html#wfx-implies-wfnormalizex- instead, see the issue.

Oops, my bad! 😅 @JohnTitor Thanks for pointing me in the right direction!

@patrickoliveira15 patrickoliveira15 changed the title remove outdated text about goal inference invariance remove outdated text about wfx implies Jan 16, 2025
@patrickoliveira15
Copy link
Contributor Author

patrickoliveira15 commented Jan 17, 2025

Adjusted!

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Left one comment otherwise LGTM!

Copy link
Member

@JohnTitor JohnTitor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@JohnTitor JohnTitor merged commit c1b4cfa into rust-lang:master Jan 17, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: this PR is waiting for a reviewer to verify its content T-types Relevant to types team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Does bug still exist?
3 participants