Implementing q-commuting Laurent polynomials.

[tscrim]

q-commuting polynomials were introduced in #34412. This implements the followup #34472 of q-commuting Laurent polynomials.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 97.40% and project coverage change: -0.04 ⚠️

Comparison is base (f449b14) 88.62% compared to head (6d47e5f) 88.58%.

❗ Current head 6d47e5f differs from pull request most recent head 592e8a7. Consider uploading reports for the commit 592e8a7 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #35054      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    88.62%   88.58%   -0.04%     
===========================================
  Files         2148     2140       -8     
  Lines       398653   397474    -1179     
===========================================
- Hits        353308   352115    -1193     
- Misses       45345    45359      +14     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/sage/algebras/q_commuting_polynomials.py	97.14% <97.36%> (-0.42%)	⬇️
src/sage/algebras/catalog.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 68 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[fchapoton]

looking at the doc reveals a few latex issues

[tscrim]

Indeed. My last commit should have fixed it/them (since it was really the same issue by copy/paste...).

[fchapoton]

522 files changed.. It seems our old workflow is no longer really good..

[tscrim]

This time I even merged it into develop... The whole setup we seem to be running for the diff is likely borked unless we have a "perfect" history. I just did a rebase (which seems to be the new SOP, but we will often have to rewrite history...), which I know fixes it.

Tests passed before except for one which was unrelated.

[tscrim]

Thank you, although I think you also need to approve the PR...

[tscrim]

Thank you.

[fchapoton]

Not sure if approval is required now. I have seen Volker saying that "positive review" was the criterion.

[tscrim]

I am not sure either; this isn't clear in the workflow doc as I recall it.

[github-actions]

Documentation preview for this PR is ready! 🎉
Built with commit: 592e8a7