-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes and simplifications for .ramified_primes()
, .discriminant()
and .is_isomorphic
of quaternion algebras
#37164
Conversation
- Fixed a bug in .discriminant() and .ramified_primes() for rational invariants - Removed unnecessary product and factoring for .ramified_primes() - Reduced description of .ramified_primes() to rational quaternion algebras in preparation of planned .ramified_places() methods over number fields (Amended: Fixed trailing whitespaces)
Accidentally closed the pull request due to renaming the branch, so I'll delay the renaming to not open a new PR. |
.ramified_primes()
and .discriminant()
of quaternion algebras.ramified_primes()
, .discriminant()
and .is_isomorphic
of quaternion algebras
- Slightly modified description of `.discriminant()` to be more accurate - Cached the method `.ramified_primes()` - Removed optional parameter `sorted` in `.ramified_primes()`, sorting the primes by default instead. - Removed `set()` functions in `.is_isomorphic` since the lists can be compared directly, as they are always sorted according to the above change. - Made description of `.is_isomorphic` slightly more explicit.
LGTM, wait for CI |
- Added `.prime_divisors` to import list - Modified product call in `.discriminant()`
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit f5fc230; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
I had a look at the failed build & test, and the only issue I could find was related to stale files in sage/tests/books/judson-abstract-algebra; this seems unrelated to this PR, unless there is some connection / a different failure reason that I'm missing. |
Yeah ignore those, see devel. That's why I gave |
… `.discriminant()` and `.is_isomorphic` of quaternion algebras 1. Removed unnecessary product and factorization for `.ramified_primes()` 2. Adapted `is_isomorphic` to reduce unnecessary calculations 3. Fixed a bug in `.discriminant()` and `.ramified_primes()` where rational invariants caused errors 4. Removed `.hilbert_conductor` from `sage.arith.misc` import list and added `.hilbert_symbol` 5. Reduced restriction of `.ramified_primes()` to rational quaternion algebras in docstring in preparation for planned `.ramified_places()` function over number fields (currently being worked on) In more detail: 1. The original workflow for `.ramified_primes()` went as follows: - Call `.discriminant()`, which calls `.hilbert_conductor` - Inside `.hilbert_conductor`, the ramified primes are computed and their product (the discriminant of the quaternion algebra) is returned - Finally, factor the discriminant back into its prime factors Hence we have a redundant product and, more crucially, a redundant prime factorization. This fix modifies `.ramified_primes()` to instead directly build the list computed in `.hilbert_conductor()` (up to a bug fix described in 3.) and return it; the list might not always be sorted by magnitude of primes, so an optional argument `sorted` (set to `False` by default) allows to enforce this (small to large) sorting. Furthermore, `.discriminant()` has been adapted to directly take the product of the list returned by `.ramified_primes()` (only in the rational case, for now - see 5.) 2. Since the `.discriminant()`-function needs to compute all (finite) ramified primes (this was also true before this PR, it was just hidden inside `.hilbert_conductor()` instead), the function `.is_isomorphic()` now compares the unsorted lists of finite ramified primes to decide whether two rational quaternion algebras are isomorphic. 3. The function `sage.arith.misc.hilbert_conductor` requires its arguments to be integers (to create certain lists of prime divisors); since it was originally used to determine the discriminant (and, as explained in 1., the ramified primes), it raises an error when the invariants are proper rational numbers. To get around the analogous error for the method `.hilbert_symbol`, we instead look at the numerators and denominators of both invariants separately, using the fact that we can (purely on a mathematical level) rescale both invariants by the squares of their respective denominators without leaving the isomorphism class of the algebra. 4. The only call to `sage.arith.misc.hilbert_conductor` in quaternion_algebra.py was given in the old computation of the discriminant (the other `.hilbert_conductor` in the code, also in `.discriminant()`, refers to the one in `sage.rings.number_field`), so it was removed from the import list. The new approach to `.ramified_primes()` requires `sage.arith.misc.hilbert_symbol`, which was added to the import list. 5. As of now the `.ramified_primes()`-method is only supported for rational quaternion algebras. I'm currently working on a version over number fields, but once it works correctly this will be implemented as a new function `.ramified_places()` to distinguish between different formats (prime numbers vs ideals) over Q and, furthermore, to not cause confusion using the term "primes" for the Archimedean real places where a quaternion algebra might ramify. Hence the implementation restriction in the docstring of `.ramified_primes()` was removed, but the method still throws a ValueError if not called with a quaternion algebra defined over the rational numbers. #sd123 URL: sagemath#37164 Reported by: Sebastian Spindler Reviewer(s): grhkm21, Sebastian Spindler
… `.discriminant()` and `.is_isomorphic` of quaternion algebras 1. Removed unnecessary product and factorization for `.ramified_primes()` 2. Adapted `is_isomorphic` to reduce unnecessary calculations 3. Fixed a bug in `.discriminant()` and `.ramified_primes()` where rational invariants caused errors 4. Removed `.hilbert_conductor` from `sage.arith.misc` import list and added `.hilbert_symbol` 5. Reduced restriction of `.ramified_primes()` to rational quaternion algebras in docstring in preparation for planned `.ramified_places()` function over number fields (currently being worked on) In more detail: 1. The original workflow for `.ramified_primes()` went as follows: - Call `.discriminant()`, which calls `.hilbert_conductor` - Inside `.hilbert_conductor`, the ramified primes are computed and their product (the discriminant of the quaternion algebra) is returned - Finally, factor the discriminant back into its prime factors Hence we have a redundant product and, more crucially, a redundant prime factorization. This fix modifies `.ramified_primes()` to instead directly build the list computed in `.hilbert_conductor()` (up to a bug fix described in 3.) and return it; the list might not always be sorted by magnitude of primes, so an optional argument `sorted` (set to `False` by default) allows to enforce this (small to large) sorting. Furthermore, `.discriminant()` has been adapted to directly take the product of the list returned by `.ramified_primes()` (only in the rational case, for now - see 5.) 2. Since the `.discriminant()`-function needs to compute all (finite) ramified primes (this was also true before this PR, it was just hidden inside `.hilbert_conductor()` instead), the function `.is_isomorphic()` now compares the unsorted lists of finite ramified primes to decide whether two rational quaternion algebras are isomorphic. 3. The function `sage.arith.misc.hilbert_conductor` requires its arguments to be integers (to create certain lists of prime divisors); since it was originally used to determine the discriminant (and, as explained in 1., the ramified primes), it raises an error when the invariants are proper rational numbers. To get around the analogous error for the method `.hilbert_symbol`, we instead look at the numerators and denominators of both invariants separately, using the fact that we can (purely on a mathematical level) rescale both invariants by the squares of their respective denominators without leaving the isomorphism class of the algebra. 4. The only call to `sage.arith.misc.hilbert_conductor` in quaternion_algebra.py was given in the old computation of the discriminant (the other `.hilbert_conductor` in the code, also in `.discriminant()`, refers to the one in `sage.rings.number_field`), so it was removed from the import list. The new approach to `.ramified_primes()` requires `sage.arith.misc.hilbert_symbol`, which was added to the import list. 5. As of now the `.ramified_primes()`-method is only supported for rational quaternion algebras. I'm currently working on a version over number fields, but once it works correctly this will be implemented as a new function `.ramified_places` (Update: see sagemath#37173) ~~to distinguish between different formats (prime numbers vs ideals) over $\mathbb{Q}$~~ (Update: this wasn't really feasible, see the issues discussed in sagemath#7596; thanks to @yyyyx4 for pointing me towards this discussion) ~~and, furthermore,~~ to not cause confusion using the term "primes" for the Archimedean real places where a quaternion algebra might ramify. Hence the implementation restriction in the docstring of `.ramified_primes()` was removed, but the method still throws a ValueError if not called with a quaternion algebra defined over the rational numbers. #sd123 URL: sagemath#37164 Reported by: Sebastian Spindler Reviewer(s): grhkm21, Sebastian Spindler
… `.discriminant()` and `.is_isomorphic` of quaternion algebras 1. Removed unnecessary product and factorization for `.ramified_primes()` 2. Adapted `is_isomorphic` to reduce unnecessary calculations 3. Fixed a bug in `.discriminant()` and `.ramified_primes()` where rational invariants caused errors 4. Removed `.hilbert_conductor` from `sage.arith.misc` import list and added `.hilbert_symbol` 5. Reduced restriction of `.ramified_primes()` to rational quaternion algebras in docstring in preparation for planned `.ramified_places()` function over number fields (currently being worked on) In more detail: 1. The original workflow for `.ramified_primes()` went as follows: - Call `.discriminant()`, which calls `.hilbert_conductor` - Inside `.hilbert_conductor`, the ramified primes are computed and their product (the discriminant of the quaternion algebra) is returned - Finally, factor the discriminant back into its prime factors Hence we have a redundant product and, more crucially, a redundant prime factorization. This fix modifies `.ramified_primes()` to instead directly build the list computed in `.hilbert_conductor()` (up to a bug fix described in 3.) and return it; the list might not always be sorted by magnitude of primes, so an optional argument `sorted` (set to `False` by default) allows to enforce this (small to large) sorting. Furthermore, `.discriminant()` has been adapted to directly take the product of the list returned by `.ramified_primes()` (only in the rational case, for now - see 5.) 2. Since the `.discriminant()`-function needs to compute all (finite) ramified primes (this was also true before this PR, it was just hidden inside `.hilbert_conductor()` instead), the function `.is_isomorphic()` now compares the unsorted lists of finite ramified primes to decide whether two rational quaternion algebras are isomorphic. 3. The function `sage.arith.misc.hilbert_conductor` requires its arguments to be integers (to create certain lists of prime divisors); since it was originally used to determine the discriminant (and, as explained in 1., the ramified primes), it raises an error when the invariants are proper rational numbers. To get around the analogous error for the method `.hilbert_symbol`, we instead look at the numerators and denominators of both invariants separately, using the fact that we can (purely on a mathematical level) rescale both invariants by the squares of their respective denominators without leaving the isomorphism class of the algebra. 4. The only call to `sage.arith.misc.hilbert_conductor` in quaternion_algebra.py was given in the old computation of the discriminant (the other `.hilbert_conductor` in the code, also in `.discriminant()`, refers to the one in `sage.rings.number_field`), so it was removed from the import list. The new approach to `.ramified_primes()` requires `sage.arith.misc.hilbert_symbol`, which was added to the import list. 5. As of now the `.ramified_primes()`-method is only supported for rational quaternion algebras. I'm currently working on a version over number fields, but once it works correctly this will be implemented as a new function `.ramified_places` (Update: see sagemath#37173) ~~to distinguish between different formats (prime numbers vs ideals) over $\mathbb{Q}$~~ (Update: this wasn't really feasible, see the issues discussed in sagemath#7596; thanks to @yyyyx4 for pointing me towards this discussion) ~~and, furthermore,~~ to not cause confusion using the term "primes" for the Archimedean real places where a quaternion algebra might ramify. Hence the implementation restriction in the docstring of `.ramified_primes()` was removed, but the method still throws a ValueError if not called with a quaternion algebra defined over the rational numbers. #sd123 URL: sagemath#37164 Reported by: Sebastian Spindler Reviewer(s): grhkm21, Sebastian Spindler
.ramified_primes()
is_isomorphic
to reduce unnecessary calculations.discriminant()
and.ramified_primes()
where rational invariants caused errors.hilbert_conductor
fromsage.arith.misc
import list and added.hilbert_symbol
.ramified_primes()
to rational quaternion algebras in docstring in preparation for planned.ramified_places()
function over number fields (currently being worked on)In more detail:
The original workflow for
.ramified_primes()
went as follows:.discriminant()
, which calls.hilbert_conductor
.hilbert_conductor
, the ramified primes are computed and their product (the discriminant of the quaternion algebra) is returnedHence we have a redundant product and, more crucially, a redundant prime factorization. This fix modifies
.ramified_primes()
to instead directly build the list computed in.hilbert_conductor()
(up to a bug fix described in 3.) and return it; the list might not always be sorted by magnitude of primes, so an optional argumentsorted
(set toFalse
by default) allows to enforce this (small to large) sorting. Furthermore,.discriminant()
has been adapted to directly take the product of the list returned by.ramified_primes()
(only in the rational case, for now - see 5.)Since the
.discriminant()
-function needs to compute all (finite) ramified primes (this was also true before this PR, it was just hidden inside.hilbert_conductor()
instead), the function.is_isomorphic()
now compares the unsorted lists of finite ramified primes to decide whether two rational quaternion algebras are isomorphic.The function
sage.arith.misc.hilbert_conductor
requires its arguments to be integers (to create certain lists of prime divisors); since it was originally used to determine the discriminant (and, as explained in 1., the ramified primes), it raises an error when the invariants are proper rational numbers. To get around the analogous error for the method.hilbert_symbol
, we instead look at the numerators and denominators of both invariants separately, using the fact that we can (purely on a mathematical level) rescale both invariants by the squares of their respective denominators without leaving the isomorphism class of the algebra.The only call to
sage.arith.misc.hilbert_conductor
in quaternion_algebra.py was given in the old computation of the discriminant (the other.hilbert_conductor
in the code, also in.discriminant()
, refers to the one insage.rings.number_field
), so it was removed from the import list. The new approach to.ramified_primes()
requiressage.arith.misc.hilbert_symbol
, which was added to the import list.As of now the
.ramified_primes()
-method is only supported for rational quaternion algebras. I'm currently working on a version over number fields, but once it works correctly this will be implemented as a new function.ramified_places
(Update: see Implemented.ramified_places
and modified further methods to extend quaternion algebra functionality to number fields #37173)to distinguish between different formats (prime numbers vs ideals) over$\mathbb{Q}$ (Update: this wasn't really feasible, see the issues discussed in QQ.number_field() does not behave like any other NumberField #7596; thanks to @yyyyx4 for pointing me towards this discussion)and, furthermore,to not cause confusion using the term "primes" for the Archimedean real places where a quaternion algebra might ramify. Hence the implementation restriction in the docstring of.ramified_primes()
was removed, but the method still throws a ValueError if not called with a quaternion algebra defined over the rational numbers.#sd123