-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 393
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v6.3.0 #4037
Merged
Merged
v6.3.0 #4037
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Will Harney <62956339+wjhsf@users.noreply.github.com>
…emplate expressions (#4026)
* docs(features): add more JSDoc for top-level exports * docs(wire-service): add more JSDoc for top-level exports * docs(lwc): fix up JSDoc * docs(compiler): add JSDoc for @lwc/compiler * docs(engine-server): polish JSDoc for @lwc/engine-server * chore: is anyone gonna read this commit message? * docs(engine-dom): polish JSDoc for @lwc/engine-dom * chore: avoid using magic string in comment
* chore: avoid @ts-ignore * chore: finish incomplete changes * fix(types): replace @ts-expect-error with type assertion * fix: avoid type errors * chore: restore explicit return type to minimize diff * refactor: use HTMLElement shadowRoot instead of defining our own * chore: remove unnecessary assertion * fix(types): correctly indicate undefined can be returned
* fix: event listener not being invoked for native web components * chore: simplify test * chore: test tweaks * chore: also avoid wrapping listeners for non-Node EventTargets * chore: account for light dom nodes * chore: account for window --------- Co-authored-by: Eugene Kashida <ekashida@gmail.com>
#4033) * feat: support generating inlined sourcemaps when transforming js files in the LWC compiler * feat: support sourcemaps through rollup plugin * fix: additional tests * fix: add test for existing use case
jmsjtu
approved these changes
Mar 7, 2024
✅ All Pre-release Checks Passed
|
🚢 Release StartingThis pull request has been merged and the release of version 6.3.0 is starting. You can monitor the progress of the release in Nucleus by visiting the following URL. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Details
v6.0.3
Does this pull request introduce a breaking change?
Does this pull request introduce an observable change?
GUS work item